1.2 sec in total
152 ms
848 ms
183 ms
Welcome to optionthink.com homepage info - get ready to check Optionthink best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about optionthink.com
Visit optionthink.comWe analyzed Optionthink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
optionthink.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
152 ms
186 ms
73 ms
157 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Optionthink.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (260 ms) belongs to the original domain Optionthink.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.5 kB (67%)
534.4 kB
176.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Optionthink.com main page is 534.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 267.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Optionthink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 197.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 197.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optionthink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (71%)
24
7
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optionthink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
optionthink.com
152 ms
www.optionthink.com
186 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
dashicons.min.css
157 ms
thickbox.css
86 ms
front.css
86 ms
style.css
198 ms
font-awesome.css
127 ms
mobilenav.css
125 ms
style.css
130 ms
jquery.js
242 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
169 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
180 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
179 ms
jquery.theme-main.min.js
194 ms
mobilenav.min.js
212 ms
flexslider.css
212 ms
public.css
209 ms
thickbox.js
222 ms
wp-embed.min.js
260 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
260 ms
optionthink-logo-2.png
149 ms
optionthink-slider-3-1080x200.jpg
150 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
93 ms
vantage-icons.woff
48 ms
gallery-prev.png
57 ms
gallery-next.png
49 ms
optionthink.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
optionthink.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
optionthink.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optionthink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Optionthink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
optionthink.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Optionthink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: