2.1 sec in total
376 ms
1.5 sec
200 ms
Visit oq.oxfordjournals.org now to see the best up-to-date Oq Oxfordjournals content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oq.oxfordjournals.org
Visit oq.oxfordjournals.orgWe analyzed Oq.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
oq.oxfordjournals.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,840 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.315
37/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
376 ms
154 ms
159 ms
163 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Oq.oxfordjournals.org, 14% (8 requests) were made to Oxfordjournals.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Gab.cookie.oup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (717 ms) relates to the external source Oxfordjournals.org.
Page size can be reduced by 259.0 kB (68%)
383.6 kB
124.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Oq.oxfordjournals.org main page is 383.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 214.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oq Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 165.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oq.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (67%)
58
19
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oq Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oq.oxfordjournals.org
376 ms
main.css
154 ms
homepage.css
159 ms
journal.css
163 ms
operaq_h20.css
144 ms
hw-preview-mode.css
147 ms
jcarousel-skin.css
160 ms
main.js
230 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
380 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
241 ms
jquery.jcarousel.local.js
244 ms
oup_ad_size.js
243 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css
65 ms
feed2js.php
717 ms
jobboard_widget.css
170 ms
jobboard_widget.js
192 ms
oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js
29 ms
caturls.js
386 ms
advert.html
189 ms
advert.html
187 ms
cover.gif
411 ms
cover.gif
376 ms
cover.gif
337 ms
cover.gif
170 ms
oxford_open_small.gif
171 ms
journals-career-network.png
170 ms
oup-logo.png
185 ms
oj_logo.gif
96 ms
contact_us.gif
88 ms
my_basket.gif
104 ms
my_account.gif
95 ms
operaq_header.jpg
292 ms
operaq_title.jpg
231 ms
nav_separator_dark_grey.gif
186 ms
about_this_journal.gif
190 ms
contact_this_journal.gif
267 ms
subscriptions.gif
268 ms
current_issue.gif
276 ms
archive.gif
275 ms
search.gif
338 ms
arrow_black.gif
377 ms
read_this_journal.gif
376 ms
4.cover.gif
419 ms
go.gif
376 ms
search_this_journal.gif
92 ms
reader_services.gif
106 ms
border_dotted_grey_horiz.gif
143 ms
the_journal.gif
144 ms
for_authors.gif
143 ms
alerting_services.gif
169 ms
corporate_services_143.gif
191 ms
footer_ouptext.gif
191 ms
border_dotted_white_horiz.gif
216 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
87 ms
1.js
289 ms
01-01-2000
229 ms
print.css
88 ms
implied
97 ms
@Top
86 ms
oq.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oq.oxfordjournals.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oq.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Oq.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oq.oxfordjournals.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oq Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: