3.8 sec in total
1 sec
2.5 sec
255 ms
Visit oraculo.org now to see the best up-to-date Oraculo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oraculo.org
Forsale Lander
Visit oraculo.orgWe analyzed Oraculo.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
oraculo.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
1038 ms
88 ms
182 ms
181 ms
146 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Oraculo.org, 9% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Oraculo.org.
Page size can be reduced by 323.6 kB (35%)
934.9 kB
611.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Oraculo.org main page is 934.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 478.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oraculo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 258.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 258.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oraculo.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (50%)
42
21
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oraculo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1038 ms
template.css
88 ms
module_default.css
182 ms
mootools-core.js
181 ms
core.js
146 ms
caption.js
122 ms
mootools-more.js
280 ms
acymailing_module.js
170 ms
general.css
215 ms
layout.css
214 ms
template.css
222 ms
left_main_right.css
223 ms
menu.css
223 ms
suckerfish.css
247 ms
module.css
257 ms
jp_typo.css
269 ms
css3.css
269 ms
slimbox.js
265 ms
moomenu.js
315 ms
typography.php
651 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
logo.png
137 ms
header_bg.gif
72 ms
website.png
147 ms
paypal_logo.jpg
146 ms
pt.gif
71 ms
en.gif
81 ms
es.gif
79 ms
develop.png
394 ms
gears.jpg
176 ms
star_icon.png
147 ms
request.png
146 ms
design.jpg
208 ms
agilidade.jpg
212 ms
custo.jpg
270 ms
ca-pub-6721114428317990.js
126 ms
zrt_lookup.html
53 ms
show_ads_impl.js
56 ms
menu_bg.png
142 ms
menu_divider.gif
175 ms
menu_shadow.png
232 ms
content_shadow.png
217 ms
osd.js
6 ms
oraculo.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
oraculo.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
oraculo.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oraculo.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oraculo.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oraculo.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oraculo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: