Tools & Wizards About Us
oralboardreview.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

oralboardreview.net

ABS CE Prep | UCI Surgery CE Review

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

oralboardreview.net screenshot

About Website

Visit oralboardreview.net now to see the best up-to-date Oralboard Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oralboardreview.net

The Surgery CE Review Course personalizes your performance on the ABS examination. Your results are our results.

Visit oralboardreview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Oralboardreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oralboardreview.net performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rowlandoralboardreview.com

102 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

940 ms

thunderbolt-commons.e8d8c161.bundle.min.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Oralboardreview.net, 33% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 19% (7 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 351.7 kB (42%)

Content Size

837.8 kB

After Optimization

486.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Oralboardreview.net main page is 837.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 451.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 346.8 kB

  • Original 451.6 kB
  • After minification 450.1 kB
  • After compression 104.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 346.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 687 B

  • Original 135.3 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oralboard Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 250.9 kB
  • After minification 250.8 kB
  • After compression 246.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oralboard Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rowlandoralboardreview.com

www.rowlandoralboardreview.com

102 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

940 ms

thunderbolt-commons.e8d8c161.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.e8d8c161.bundle.min.js

27 ms

main.cd290f82.bundle.min.js

main.cd290f82.bundle.min.js

63 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

24 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

62 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

26 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

64 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

62 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

62 ms

173fc7cfe6644cbdb64878fcc07b82d5.jpg

173fc7cfe6644cbdb64878fcc07b82d5.jpg

80 ms

uci_Med_fl_p7685_edited.png

uci_Med_fl_p7685_edited.png

266 ms

fire.jpg

fire.jpg

375 ms

08d03414eebbd504a90760c292ff6fb8.jpg

08d03414eebbd504a90760c292ff6fb8.jpg

214 ms

8e9997d4c64e4581bb2f2fd5fe875b31.jpg

8e9997d4c64e4581bb2f2fd5fe875b31.jpg

181 ms

Reading%20a%20Book.jpg

Reading%20a%20Book.jpg

318 ms

ACCME-commendation-full-color.jpg

ACCME-commendation-full-color.jpg

382 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

47 ms

101 ms

101 ms

102 ms

99 ms

95 ms

96 ms

131 ms

132 ms

132 ms

129 ms

129 ms

126 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

oralboardreview.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

oralboardreview.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

oralboardreview.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oralboardreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oralboardreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oralboardreview.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oralboard Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: