Tools & Wizards About Us
orfa.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

orfa.com

Ontario Recreation Facilities Association Inc. - ORFA Home

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

766 ms

Page Rendered

283 ms

orfa.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to orfa.com homepage info - get ready to check ORFA best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about orfa.com

he Ontario Recreation Facilities Association (ORFA) was created in 1947 and incorporated in 1951 as a provincially-recognized, not-for-profit, volunteer-driven recreation organization. Today, the ORFA...

Visit orfa.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Orfa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

orfa.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

orfa.com

52 ms

orfa.wildapricot.org

215 ms

combined.css

34 ms

customStyles.css

108 ms

user.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Orfa.com, 35% (11 requests) were made to Orfa.wildapricot.org and 35% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.wildapricot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (27%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Orfa.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 101.1 kB
  • After minification 98.8 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 674.1 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ORFA needs image optimization as it can save up to 674.1 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 410.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 978.5 kB
  • After compression 615.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.6 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 242.2 kB
  • After minification 213.8 kB
  • After compression 190.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Orfa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ORFA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

orfa.com

orfa.com

52 ms

orfa.wildapricot.org

orfa.wildapricot.org

215 ms

combined.css

combined.css

34 ms

customStyles.css

customStyles.css

108 ms

user.css

user.css

78 ms

index-9cf11fa.css

index-9cf11fa.css

26 ms

shared-ui-compiled.css

shared-ui-compiled.css

64 ms

bonapagetop-compiled.js

bonapagetop-compiled.js

81 ms

index-9cf11fa.js

index-9cf11fa.js

84 ms

shared-ui-compiled.js

shared-ui-compiled.js

81 ms

General.js

General.js

80 ms

combined.js

combined.js

84 ms

js

js

83 ms

js

js

271 ms

close.png

close.png

66 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

64 ms

prev.png

prev.png

105 ms

next.png

next.png

155 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

119 ms

async-load-progress-01.gif

async-load-progress-01.gif

106 ms

ARIS_Banner01.png

ARIS_Banner01.png

87 ms

2023AGM-banner3.png

2023AGM-banner3.png

57 ms

orfa-new-web-499.png

orfa-new-web-499.png

57 ms

2020-Events-Brochure-button.png

2020-Events-Brochure-button.png

56 ms

awards2023_recipientbanner.png

awards2023_recipientbanner.png

56 ms

community-publicationhighlights-expo.jpg

community-publicationhighlights-expo.jpg

27 ms

community-RFAM-cornellCC.jpg

community-RFAM-cornellCC.jpg

30 ms

orfa_gbp.png

orfa_gbp.png

30 ms

information-watertesting.jpg

information-watertesting.jpg

9 ms

ORFA-logo-2015-RELEASE-RGB.jpg

ORFA-logo-2015-RELEASE-RGB.jpg

11 ms

award2019.jpg

award2019.jpg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

orfa.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

orfa.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

orfa.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Orfa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Orfa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

orfa.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ORFA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: