5.8 sec in total
364 ms
4.7 sec
783 ms
Click here to check amazing Orgnac content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about orgnac.com
Cette histoire commence il y a 100 millions d’années, depuis la formation de la roche calcaire, jusqu’à la découverte de l’Aven d’Orgnac en 1935 qui nous permet d’admirer de gigantesques salles souter...
Visit orgnac.comWe analyzed Orgnac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
orgnac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value7.1 s
30/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
364 ms
880 ms
377 ms
288 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Orgnac.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Orgnac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (58%)
2.0 MB
840.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Orgnac.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 959.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Orgnac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 680.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 680.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 442.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Orgnac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 442.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (68%)
82
26
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Orgnac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
orgnac.com
364 ms
880 ms
k2.css
377 ms
jcemediabox.css
288 ms
style.css
289 ms
widgetkit-dd2f3733.css
574 ms
modal.css
196 ms
font-awesome.css
384 ms
normalize.css
386 ms
layout.css
477 ms
joomla.css
578 ms
system.css
472 ms
template.css
582 ms
menu.css
584 ms
gk.stuff.css
662 ms
style1.css
580 ms
typography.style1.css
671 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
css
47 ms
template.css
672 ms
mootools-core.js
990 ms
core.js
676 ms
jquery.min.js
1033 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
755 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
759 ms
k2.js
761 ms
jcemediabox.js
951 ms
widgetkit-14234c70.js
944 ms
bootstrap.min.js
950 ms
mootools-more.js
1428 ms
modal.js
1067 ms
modernizr.js
1067 ms
gk.scripts.js
1067 ms
gk.menu.js
1082 ms
kalendae.js
1221 ms
scrollreveal.js
1135 ms
fitvids.jquery.js
1141 ms
script.mootools.js
1141 ms
override.css
1177 ms
main.js
1155 ms
lightbox.js
178 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
433 ms
spotlight.js
214 ms
Mm8DWXYj0WM
167 ms
header_bg.jpg
677 ms
logo-small.png
157 ms
fr.gif
155 ms
de.gif
156 ms
nl.gif
155 ms
en.gif
153 ms
logo.png
240 ms
horaires-tarifs.png
240 ms
acces.png
239 ms
agenda.png
238 ms
achat-billet.png
239 ms
scolaire.png
330 ms
parallax_bg.jpg
328 ms
k2.items.cache.8462850dbb62c4bd159ee1ad55df6950_XLnsp-843.jpg
329 ms
k2.items.cache.218fa54275e0e31c37b4e5091d9112ba_XLnsp-843.jpg
330 ms
specials_bg.jpg
329 ms
grotte-aven-orgnac-ardeche.jpg
502 ms
facebook.png
418 ms
twitter.png
420 ms
youtube.png
417 ms
google-plus.png
418 ms
tripadvisor.png
518 ms
5AUH_bu0Kry_Rnde4VJNk6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
sIB6Zipah1bAnMw6oQYPEHYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
79 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
78 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
77 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
82 ms
RXTgOOQ9AAtaVOHxx0IUBF5f9YK0z_CKegLiCihVlJo.ttf
78 ms
steakhouse-pixellove.woff
431 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
718 ms
cd-top-arrow.svg
436 ms
popup.html
452 ms
tooltip.html
454 ms
close.png
455 ms
blank.gif
455 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
54 ms
base.js
84 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
49 ms
ad_status.js
58 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
47 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
47 ms
small.desktop.css
99 ms
tablet.css
98 ms
small.tablet.css
98 ms
mobile.css
98 ms
js
76 ms
orgnac.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
orgnac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
orgnac.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Orgnac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Orgnac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
orgnac.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Orgnac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: