Tools & Wizards About Us
orton-gillingham.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

orton-gillingham.com

Orton-Gillingham | Orton-Gillingham and So Much More

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

170 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

482 ms

orton-gillingham.com screenshot

About Website

Visit orton-gillingham.com now to see the best up-to-date Orton Gillingham content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about orton-gillingham.com

Learn about the benefits of the Orton-Gillingham approach and how innovative educators are using Orton-Gillingham to help every student learn to read.

Visit orton-gillingham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Orton-gillingham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

orton-gillingham.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

orton-gillingham.com

170 ms

www.orton-gillingham.com

295 ms

style.min.css

86 ms

styles.css

149 ms

normalize.min.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Orton-gillingham.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) belongs to the original domain Orton-gillingham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (29%)

Content Size

9.5 MB

After Optimization

6.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Orton-gillingham.com main page is 9.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 38.7 kB

  • Original 48.2 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 2.7 MB

  • Original 9.1 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Orton Gillingham needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 325.5 kB
  • After minification 325.5 kB
  • After compression 323.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 60.1 kB
  • After minification 60.0 kB
  • After compression 54.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Orton-gillingham.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Orton Gillingham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

orton-gillingham.com

orton-gillingham.com

170 ms

www.orton-gillingham.com

www.orton-gillingham.com

295 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

86 ms

styles.css

styles.css

149 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

188 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

261 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

190 ms

lity.min.css

lity.min.css

193 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

192 ms

build.css

build.css

218 ms

style.css

style.css

250 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

324 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

257 ms

style.css

style.css

255 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

js

js

60 ms

index.js

index.js

281 ms

index.js

index.js

311 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

416 ms

lity.min.js

lity.min.js

320 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

321 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

416 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

417 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

418 ms

api.js

api.js

38 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

417 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

418 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

418 ms

index.js

index.js

452 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

83 ms

Orton-Gillingham.com_.png

Orton-Gillingham.com_.png

118 ms

Group-13.png

Group-13.png

557 ms

AdobeStock_331427528.png

AdobeStock_331427528.png

592 ms

circlebrg.png

circlebrg.png

260 ms

Group-15.png

Group-15.png

624 ms

logo-imse-bg.png

logo-imse-bg.png

171 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

84 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

139 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

142 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

158 ms

AdobeStock_86630580.png

AdobeStock_86630580.png

379 ms

AdobeStock_218730174.png

AdobeStock_218730174.png

361 ms

AdobeStock_109780159.png

AdobeStock_109780159.png

427 ms

AdobeStock_94632662.jpg

AdobeStock_94632662.jpg

485 ms

anchor

anchor

42 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

5 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

12 ms

8AXZAK1i6BpqK69J99oN0p3RtJQ1PGMK6D_RgjsU7ps.js

8AXZAK1i6BpqK69J99oN0p3RtJQ1PGMK6D_RgjsU7ps.js

43 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

41 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

31 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

33 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

33 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

33 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

orton-gillingham.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

orton-gillingham.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

orton-gillingham.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Orton-gillingham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Orton-gillingham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

orton-gillingham.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Orton Gillingham. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: