Tools & Wizards About Us
osceolafence.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

osceolafence.net

Fence Company Chicago: Reliable Contractor For Commercial & Residential

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

osceolafence.net screenshot

About Website

Visit osceolafence.net now to see the best up-to-date Osceola Fence content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about osceolafence.net

Fence Company Chicago: The Best Builders Of Iron, Pvc, Wood, Steel, Chain Link And More. Commercial And Residential. Call (773) 278-4762.

Visit osceolafence.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Osceolafence.net page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

osceolafence.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,620 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

osceolafence.net

141 ms

osceolafence.net

2780 ms

pa-frontend-41126c4a4.min.css

114 ms

style.min.css

128 ms

main.min.css

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 142 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Osceolafence.net, 32% (45 requests) were made to B1287198.smushcdn.com and 6% (9 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Osceolafence.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 762.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Osceolafence.net main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 673.2 kB

  • Original 756.4 kB
  • After minification 739.9 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 673.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Osceola Fence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 517.2 kB
  • After minification 517.2 kB
  • After compression 475.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 201.3 kB
  • After minification 201.3 kB
  • After compression 158.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osceolafence.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (50%)

Requests Now

135

After Optimization

67

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Osceola Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

osceolafence.net

osceolafence.net

141 ms

osceolafence.net

osceolafence.net

2780 ms

pa-frontend-41126c4a4.min.css

pa-frontend-41126c4a4.min.css

114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

128 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

155 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

158 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

170 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

176 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

124 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

121 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

156 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

150 ms

she-header-style.css

she-header-style.css

158 ms

wpforms-base.min.css

wpforms-base.min.css

169 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

236 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

176 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

187 ms

css

css

62 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

202 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

195 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

208 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

223 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

258 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

256 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

255 ms

she-header.js

she-header.js

256 ms

js

js

93 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

321 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

324 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

311 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

312 ms

api.js

api.js

55 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

328 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

321 ms

trustindex-google-widget.css

trustindex-google-widget.css

364 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

316 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

316 ms

pa-frontend-41126c4a4.min.js

pa-frontend-41126c4a4.min.js

485 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

637 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

637 ms

loader.js

loader.js

28 ms

api.js

api.js

64 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

601 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

583 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

578 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

630 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

703 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

605 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

606 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

595 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

579 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

748 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

747 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

736 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

729 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

717 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

709 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

756 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

752 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

739 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

772 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

707 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

705 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

775 ms

Screen_Shot_2023-01-13_at_2.38.01_PM-removebg-preview-300x293.png

Screen_Shot_2023-01-13_at_2.38.01_PM-removebg-preview-300x293.png

346 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

49 ms

ALV-UjVQiVSz4jybqwGBGZkFKtqJyJemS9kiDOyJwYEfI27Plp0s9gE=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjVQiVSz4jybqwGBGZkFKtqJyJemS9kiDOyJwYEfI27Plp0s9gE=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

416 ms

googlereview-removebg-preview.png

googlereview-removebg-preview.png

421 ms

Vinyl-Fence-Chicago-IL.png

Vinyl-Fence-Chicago-IL.png

426 ms

The-Best-Vinyl-Fence-Chicago.png

The-Best-Vinyl-Fence-Chicago.png

426 ms

LOGO_BBB-removebg-preview-e1715710284940.png

LOGO_BBB-removebg-preview-e1715710284940.png

419 ms

LOGO-AFA.png

LOGO-AFA.png

421 ms

Logo-Cert-6-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-6-150x150.png

419 ms

Logo-Cert-1-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-1-150x150.png

439 ms

Logo-Cert-2-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-2-150x150.png

439 ms

Logo-Cert-5-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-5-150x150.png

438 ms

Logo-Cert-3-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-3-150x150.png

438 ms

Logo-Cert-4-150x150.png

Logo-Cert-4-150x150.png

446 ms

google.png

google.png

439 ms

thumbtack.png

thumbtack.png

442 ms

yelp.png

yelp.png

441 ms

angieslist.png

angieslist.png

441 ms

Illinois-Fence-Contractor-164x300.png

Illinois-Fence-Contractor-164x300.png

443 ms

ACg8ocIPmaStclQtiCve77cuSHBfni6xRw-HI781w_KQlQEeScs6iQ=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocIPmaStclQtiCve77cuSHBfni6xRw-HI781w_KQlQEeScs6iQ=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

424 ms

ALV-UjX3n8ZDVQaPHMLSrXmilufmDGk_aap8JacVeFd5ihbGgl92FZrQ=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjX3n8ZDVQaPHMLSrXmilufmDGk_aap8JacVeFd5ihbGgl92FZrQ=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

670 ms

ACg8ocLtnh7hmPQLDRppynBuaES47mA0pjP5WiqAIbTindHnzGFr6Q=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocLtnh7hmPQLDRppynBuaES47mA0pjP5WiqAIbTindHnzGFr6Q=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

423 ms

ALV-UjV6w0mwSUos0zPnytoGmoEXbxufEP7Jtb2e0PKdNTwoRbgq39Q=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjV6w0mwSUos0zPnytoGmoEXbxufEP7Jtb2e0PKdNTwoRbgq39Q=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

616 ms

ALV-UjWedjwYmPmVZ_yufZZySFKRx-93gKPEyElUypWs_171ynUY-jB4=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjWedjwYmPmVZ_yufZZySFKRx-93gKPEyElUypWs_171ynUY-jB4=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

618 ms

ALV-UjWzFMWOb_cBywyA41OsAEVbB3VadAl2gz7Gd5Kf7xm6JwEmXvw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjWzFMWOb_cBywyA41OsAEVbB3VadAl2gz7Gd5Kf7xm6JwEmXvw=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

662 ms

ACg8ocJ_0KVsyb-VuMiz_Y9leDEZ6_Zaxk5puqmUzarbnS9vvCkrFOi7=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ACg8ocJ_0KVsyb-VuMiz_Y9leDEZ6_Zaxk5puqmUzarbnS9vvCkrFOi7=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

438 ms

ALV-UjXbAJCzeRA4B_mPcg7OdHwvWvFCeQorE36DiQvy_oXHaYw00NA=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

ALV-UjXbAJCzeRA4B_mPcg7OdHwvWvFCeQorE36DiQvy_oXHaYw00NA=s120-c-rp-mo-br100

617 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

711 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

711 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

709 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

707 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

414 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

707 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

704 ms

badge.aspx

badge.aspx

574 ms

Chicago-Fences-Company-Iron.jpg

Chicago-Fences-Company-Iron.jpg

349 ms

Chicago-Fencing-Company-Chain-Link.jpg

Chicago-Fencing-Company-Chain-Link.jpg

351 ms

osceola-fence-commercial-wood-fence-chicago-usa-1-1-1-scaled.jpg

osceola-fence-commercial-wood-fence-chicago-usa-1-1-1-scaled.jpg

430 ms

Wood-and-Vinyl-Picket-Fencing-scaled-1-scaled.jpg

Wood-and-Vinyl-Picket-Fencing-scaled-1-scaled.jpg

351 ms

Composite-Fence-Chicago-1-1-scaled.jpg

Composite-Fence-Chicago-1-1-scaled.jpg

430 ms

osceola-fence-residential-iron-balcony-railing-chicago-il.jpg

osceola-fence-residential-iron-balcony-railing-chicago-il.jpg

428 ms

Automatic-gates-Chicago-gate-openers.jpg

Automatic-gates-Chicago-gate-openers.jpg

432 ms

security-camera-system-chicago.jpeg

security-camera-system-chicago.jpeg

433 ms

iron-green-bollards-chicago.jpg

iron-green-bollards-chicago.jpg

518 ms

The-Best-Industrial-Fencing-in-Chicago-Illinois.png

The-Best-Industrial-Fencing-in-Chicago-Illinois.png

518 ms

best-fence-company-chicago-scaled.jpg

best-fence-company-chicago-scaled.jpg

434 ms

fences-installation-company-chicago-e1578960753337.jpg

fences-installation-company-chicago-e1578960753337.jpg

433 ms

eagle-logo-blank-1-300x106.png

eagle-logo-blank-1-300x106.png

568 ms

dks-doorking-logo-2017.png

dks-doorking-logo-2017.png

434 ms

Osceola-Commercial-Security-Cameras-Chicago-4-Locinox.png

Osceola-Commercial-Security-Cameras-Chicago-4-Locinox.png

515 ms

delta-screw-logo.png

delta-screw-logo.png

515 ms

Bufftech-logo-1-e1710994268333.jpg

Bufftech-logo-1-e1710994268333.jpg

515 ms

BLD_Logo.png

BLD_Logo.png

560 ms

aalogo.gif

aalogo.gif

560 ms

f.svg

f.svg

117 ms

h.svg

h.svg

93 ms

icon.svg

icon.svg

91 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

599 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

598 ms

font

font

115 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

691 ms

font

font

199 ms

font

font

280 ms

font

font

280 ms

font

font

327 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

691 ms

apollogateopeners-logo.png

apollogateopeners-logo.png

327 ms

wexler_logo.png

wexler_logo.png

250 ms

TS-Distributors_Logo.png

TS-Distributors_Logo.png

244 ms

commercial-fence-installation-for-prision-chicago-300x300.jpg

commercial-fence-installation-for-prision-chicago-300x300.jpg

248 ms

commercial-fence-installation-for-school-chicago-300x300.jpg

commercial-fence-installation-for-school-chicago-300x300.jpg

242 ms

commercial-fence-installation-sport-center-chicago-300x300.jpg

commercial-fence-installation-sport-center-chicago-300x300.jpg

240 ms

commercial-fence-installation-for-wherehouse-chicago-300x300.jpg

commercial-fence-installation-for-wherehouse-chicago-300x300.jpg

242 ms

FENCE-COMPANY-CHICAGO-e1578960161259.jpg

FENCE-COMPANY-CHICAGO-e1578960161259.jpg

229 ms

Screen-Shot-2024-05-30-at-2.57.43-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2024-05-30-at-2.57.43-PM.png

229 ms

embed

embed

362 ms

promatcher02.jpg

promatcher02.jpg

358 ms

js

js

224 ms

Accessibility Review

osceolafence.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

osceolafence.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

osceolafence.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osceolafence.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osceolafence.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

osceolafence.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Osceola Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: