2.3 sec in total
150 ms
1.9 sec
270 ms
Visit osgi.org now to see the best up-to-date OSGi content for Austria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about osgi.org
The OSGi Working Group is a worldwide consortium of technology innovators that advances a proven and mature process to create open specifications that enable …
Visit osgi.orgWe analyzed Osgi.org page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Osgi.org rating and web reputation
osgi.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
150 ms
232 ms
385 ms
75 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Osgi.org, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (717 ms) belongs to the original domain Osgi.org.
Page size can be reduced by 406.9 kB (41%)
997.7 kB
590.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Osgi.org main page is 997.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 511.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OSGi images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 212.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 212.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osgi.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (46%)
68
37
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OSGi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
osgi.org
150 ms
www.osgi.org
232 ms
www.osgi.org
385 ms
jquery.min.js
75 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
73 ms
cnss.css
142 ms
newsscrollcss.css
207 ms
css
73 ms
style.css
209 ms
css
117 ms
style.css
211 ms
font-awesome.css
211 ms
admin_style.min.css
212 ms
jquery.js
279 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
cnss.js
276 ms
jv.js
274 ms
jquery.newsTicker.js
273 ms
stylesheet.min.css
354 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
default.css
354 ms
flexslider.css
355 ms
public.css
355 ms
public.css
355 ms
core.min.js
356 ms
widget.min.js
357 ms
mouse.min.js
429 ms
sortable.min.js
428 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
428 ms
theme.js
433 ms
wp-embed.min.js
428 ms
_scripts.min.js
432 ms
starter.min.js
527 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
526 ms
floatmenu.js
440 ms
ga.js
87 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
419 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
solid.png
587 ms
search.jpg
223 ms
logo.jpg
575 ms
twitter.jpg
576 ms
other.jpg
577 ms
linkedin.jpg
577 ms
GitHub-Mark-32px.png
577 ms
loading.gif
578 ms
blueblockbottom.png
580 ms
icon_developer.png
579 ms
icon_business.png
580 ms
icon_enroute.png
581 ms
Paremus-Member-Slider.jpeg
582 ms
IBM1.jpg
583 ms
Oracle-member-slider.jpeg
585 ms
Luminis_Basis_ComplVector_ZondMasker.jpg
583 ms
SAG-Logo_150x75.jpg
586 ms
2014-Liferay-Logo-Horizontal-1.png
587 ms
20150713_ProSystBG-RGB_72dpi_150x75.png
547 ms
NTT.jpg
545 ms
Cloudyle.jpg
546 ms
makewave-150x75.png
547 ms
HW_POS_RGB_Horizontal1.jpg
717 ms
Adobe2.jpeg
575 ms
Brandmark_Ha_E_Color-copy-150x75.jpeg
574 ms
_dCzxpXzIS3sL-gdJWAP8A.ttf
115 ms
M7no6oPkwKYJkedjB1wqEvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
156 ms
VGEV9-DrblisWOWLbK-1XPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
524 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
523 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
521 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
666 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
23 ms
DT2.jpeg
504 ms
spotlight.jpg
504 ms
tools.jpg
519 ms
internet.jpg
521 ms
enterprises.jpg
549 ms
cloud.jpg
557 ms
blog.jpg
493 ms
wiki.png
495 ms
bigpuzzle.jpg
251 ms
osgi.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
osgi.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
osgi.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osgi.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osgi.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
osgi.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of OSGi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: