9.2 sec in total
424 ms
7.7 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Osterloh content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about osterloh.org
Visit osterloh.orgWe analyzed Osterloh.org page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
osterloh.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.6 s
0/100
10%
Value6,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
424 ms
687 ms
282 ms
662 ms
293 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Osterloh.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (786 ms) belongs to the original domain Osterloh.org.
Page size can be reduced by 342.1 kB (23%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Osterloh.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 582.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 320.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 320.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Osterloh needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 351 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osterloh.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (76%)
62
15
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Osterloh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
osterloh.org
424 ms
www.osterloh.org
687 ms
e8jbf.css
282 ms
e8jbf.css
662 ms
e8jbf.css
293 ms
jquery.min.js
382 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
294 ms
workflow.bundle.js
295 ms
utils.min.js
373 ms
moxie.min.js
472 ms
plupload.min.js
376 ms
jquery.queryloader2.min.js
377 ms
donate-sdk.js
20 ms
css
37 ms
e8jbf.css
288 ms
jquery.form.min.js
291 ms
index.js
292 ms
index.js
294 ms
rbtools.min.js
394 ms
rs6.min.js
686 ms
underscore.min.js
386 ms
shortcode.min.js
384 ms
backbone.min.js
386 ms
wp-util.min.js
676 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
676 ms
media-models.min.js
676 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
677 ms
core.min.js
677 ms
mouse.min.js
676 ms
sortable.min.js
677 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
678 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
678 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
679 ms
api-request.min.js
678 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
680 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
702 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
703 ms
dom-ready.min.js
761 ms
hooks.min.js
761 ms
i18n.min.js
764 ms
a11y.min.js
659 ms
clipboard.min.js
668 ms
media-views.min.js
685 ms
media-editor.min.js
746 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
669 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
681 ms
compresed.min.js
786 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
677 ms
sly.min.js
621 ms
borlabs-cookie.min.js
692 ms
logo-dark.png
310 ms
logo-dark-166x60.png
311 ms
dummy.png
312 ms
maria-kluge-2023-650x650.jpg
353 ms
pusteblume-icon80-80x80.png
380 ms
logo.png
380 ms
e8jbf.css
146 ms
maria.jpeg
302 ms
730634766
201 ms
1470476437-fb18f958fa89c8649b5260a800038263ff19d578b548289e8312a6635be14783-d
157 ms
dfd-added-font-icon.svg
149 ms
dfd-added-font-icon.ttf
147 ms
dfd_icon_set.svg
681 ms
dfd_icon_set.woff
681 ms
file.PNG
164 ms
soc-icons.svg
202 ms
soc-icons.woff
202 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
106 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
107 ms
osterloh.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
osterloh.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
osterloh.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osterloh.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osterloh.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
osterloh.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Osterloh. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: