3.3 sec in total
720 ms
2.5 sec
86 ms
Click here to check amazing Otoric content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about otoric.com
Visit otoric.comWe analyzed Otoric.com page load time and found that the first response time was 720 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
otoric.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
720 ms
207 ms
209 ms
211 ms
414 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Otoric.com, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Otoric.com.
Page size can be reduced by 520.2 kB (71%)
736.0 kB
215.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Otoric.com main page is 736.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 456.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Otoric needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 313.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Otoric.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)
27
3
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Otoric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
otoric.com
720 ms
style.min.css
207 ms
theme.min.css
209 ms
header-footer.min.css
211 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
414 ms
post-6.css
211 ms
swiper.min.css
278 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
413 ms
global.css
477 ms
post-8.css
417 ms
css
88 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
417 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
489 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
616 ms
jquery.min.js
753 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
618 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
768 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
682 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
690 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1021 ms
hooks.min.js
822 ms
i18n.min.js
890 ms
frontend.min.js
959 ms
waypoints.min.js
957 ms
core.min.js
1035 ms
frontend.min.js
1092 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1175 ms
400x400-white-1024x1024.jpg
1312 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
41 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
62 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
75 ms
otoric.com accessibility score
otoric.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
otoric.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Otoric.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Otoric.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
otoric.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Otoric. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: