Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ourcut.com

ourcut.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

287 ms

Resources Loaded

982 ms

Page Rendered

151 ms

ourcut.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ourcut content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ourcut.com

Visit ourcut.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ourcut.com page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ourcut.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ourcut.com

287 ms

chatfid.biz

669 ms

master-ResetCSS.css

14 ms

master-GlobalResults.css

14 ms

634104825689501121.jpg

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ourcut.com, 82% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.firstlook.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Chatfid.biz. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (669 ms) relates to the external source Chatfid.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.6 kB (50%)

Content Size

49.4 kB

After Optimization

24.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Ourcut.com main page is 49.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 27.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 27.7 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ourcut images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 596 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ourcut.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ourcut. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ourcut.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ourcut.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ourcut.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ourcut.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ourcut.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ourcut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: