Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

outdoor.ru

Новости - Outdoor

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

430 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

318 ms

outdoor.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to outdoor.ru homepage info - get ready to check Outdoor best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about outdoor.ru

Все о рекламе. Статьи. Новости. Компании.

Visit outdoor.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Outdoor.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

outdoor.ru performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

outdoor.ru

430 ms

outdoor.ru

829 ms

common.css

118 ms

colors.css

246 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Outdoor.ru, 13% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Outdoor.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 200.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Outdoor.ru main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 125.3 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Outdoor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 194.9 kB
  • After minification 194.9 kB
  • After compression 172.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Outdoor.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Outdoor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

outdoor.ru accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

outdoor.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

outdoor.ru SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Outdoor.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Outdoor.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Outdoor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: