Tools & Wizards About Us
outdoorreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

outdoorreview.com

Ski, snowboard, climb, hike & trail run gear reviews, buy and sell used outdoor gear, forums, hot deals and more - outdoorreview.com

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

outdoorreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit outdoorreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Outdoor Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about outdoorreview.com

OutdoorReview brings you user reviews and editorial reviews on ski, snowboard, climb, hike & trail run gear, news, forums, photo galleries, and more.

Visit outdoorreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Outdoorreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

outdoorreview.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.outdoorreview.com

1349 ms

bootstrap.min.css

122 ms

header-widget.css

29 ms

style.css

130 ms

style-gradient.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Outdoorreview.com, 39% (19 requests) were made to Content.outdoorreview.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Sparkle-assets.consumerreview.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Outdoorreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

600.7 kB

After Optimization

464.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Outdoorreview.com main page is 600.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 344.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 101.3 kB

  • Original 116.5 kB
  • After minification 103.6 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Outdoor Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 344.9 kB
  • After minification 344.9 kB
  • After compression 342.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 57.0 kB
  • After minification 51.7 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Outdoorreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (39%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Outdoor Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.outdoorreview.com

www.outdoorreview.com

1349 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

122 ms

header-widget.css

header-widget.css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

130 ms

style-gradient.css

style-gradient.css

36 ms

mobile-style.css

mobile-style.css

134 ms

ekko-lightbox.css

ekko-lightbox.css

135 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

105 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

10 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

44 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

261 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

308 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

318 ms

ga.js

ga.js

223 ms

search_icon.png

search_icon.png

515 ms

top-bg.png

top-bg.png

207 ms

topnav-cur.png

topnav-cur.png

73 ms

bg.png

bg.png

101 ms

top-bg.png

top-bg.png

101 ms

logo.png

logo.png

101 ms

product_80059.jpg

product_80059.jpg

72 ms

product_328210.jpg

product_328210.jpg

75 ms

product_111666.jpg

product_111666.jpg

73 ms

product_473874.jpg

product_473874.jpg

73 ms

product_111679.jpg

product_111679.jpg

73 ms

product_111660.jpg

product_111660.jpg

74 ms

product_96711.jpg

product_96711.jpg

445 ms

product_78771.jpg

product_78771.jpg

74 ms

product_79996.jpg

product_79996.jpg

73 ms

product_103384.jpg

product_103384.jpg

74 ms

product_77113.jpg

product_77113.jpg

75 ms

product_77264.jpg

product_77264.jpg

74 ms

product_77208.jpg

product_77208.jpg

75 ms

product_77169.jpg

product_77169.jpg

75 ms

product_98748.jpg

product_98748.jpg

76 ms

product_78726.jpg

product_78726.jpg

76 ms

product_78737.jpg

product_78737.jpg

76 ms

product_78727.jpg

product_78727.jpg

77 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

67 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

280 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

374 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

243 ms

all.js

all.js

258 ms

ads

ads

81 ms

container.html

container.html

74 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

11 ms

all.js

all.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

outdoorreview.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

outdoorreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

outdoorreview.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Outdoorreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Outdoorreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

outdoorreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Outdoor Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: