3 sec in total
74 ms
1.9 sec
1.1 sec
Visit ovago.com now to see the best up-to-date Ovago content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ovago.com
Visit ovago.comWe analyzed Ovago.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ovago.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
74 ms
68 ms
10 ms
104 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Ovago.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Promo.ovago.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (938 ms) relates to the external source Statics.yespo.io.
Page size can be reduced by 906.6 kB (17%)
5.3 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Ovago.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 904.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 904.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ovago images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ovago.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (31%)
84
58
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ovago. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ovago.com
74 ms
68 ms
ga.js
10 ms
gtm.js
104 ms
autoptimize_single_fe684c95ffe88eaa32c86c7271115c41.css
50 ms
autoptimize_single_779f73811f5659317880c1b3ddda08f2.css
56 ms
style.min.css
188 ms
autoptimize_single_4b7108770eeeba732b700c7c3565023b.css
48 ms
style.min.css
193 ms
autoptimize_single_a8caf11afe8c8abe00b4c9dec344ec7b.css
55 ms
autoptimize_single_43f7233303a882014c98f85bc49dcf41.css
59 ms
autoptimize_single_e24805614290ec72c93a986a5468a5f7.css
62 ms
autoptimize_single_184f05085c1ae92763369e67f11f5f1e.css
63 ms
autoptimize_single_f27f6c8f65842495971feaf134c17af6.css
69 ms
autoptimize_single_92bdaeb51b04409af0304728c26dd75f.css
78 ms
style.min.css
221 ms
autoptimize_single_d2c41e6f53309eb35b62dd0e5aaa3660.css
81 ms
autoptimize_single_e608ba3231cd7f4471e4f041b7b7d624.css
87 ms
autoptimize_single_7d3c4b0fba04af090230a52f752849a4.css
77 ms
jquery.min.js
89 ms
moment.min.js
90 ms
view.js
243 ms
view.js
241 ms
view.min.js
176 ms
typeahead.bundle.min.js
167 ms
hooks.min.js
172 ms
i18n.min.js
177 ms
autoptimize_6580e032ef2ad773d4c3a6c835336f6e.js
186 ms
wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js
161 ms
logo.svg
163 ms
agent.png
150 ms
Hero-1440-2-1-scaled.jpg
167 ms
calendar-icon.svg
153 ms
French-Riviera-France.jpg
23 ms
Santorini-Greece.jpg
23 ms
Bali-Indonesia.jpg
66 ms
Paris-France.jpg
231 ms
Cinque-Terre-Italy.jpg
66 ms
Tulum-Mexico.jpg
66 ms
Venice-Italy.jpg
68 ms
Laucala-Island-Fiji.jpg
103 ms
Bora-Bora-French-Polynesia.jpg
104 ms
Ari-Atoll-Maldives.jpg
111 ms
Waikiki-Hawaii.jpg
251 ms
Bahamas-Caribbean.jpg
157 ms
Chac-Mool-Beach-Mexico.jpg
165 ms
Copacabana-Brazil.jpg
167 ms
Lisbon-Portugal.jpg
172 ms
Amsterdam-Netherlands.jpg
175 ms
Istanbul-Turkey.jpg
175 ms
Rome-Italy.jpg
177 ms
London-United-Kingdom.jpg
181 ms
Barcelona-Spain.jpg
189 ms
Prague-Czech-Republic.jpg
190 ms
Zermatt-Switzerland.jpg
187 ms
Brussels-Belgium.jpg
192 ms
Kitzbuhel-Austria.jpg
197 ms
Prague-Czech-Republic-1.jpg
198 ms
Edinburgh-United-Kingdom.jpg
199 ms
Budapest-Hungary.jpg
202 ms
Courchevel-France.jpg
206 ms
Northern-Light-Iceland.jpg
213 ms
Geirangerfjord-Norway.jpg
208 ms
Mount-Fuji-Japan.jpg
240 ms
Patagonia-Argentina.jpg
199 ms
Himalayas-Nepal.jpg
201 ms
europe.svg
516 ms
Machu-Picchu-Peru.jpg
530 ms
Uluru-Rocks-Australia.jpg
168 ms
Marrakech-Morocco.jpg
171 ms
tag.js
36 ms
Giza-Pyramids-Egypt.jpg
150 ms
Petra-Jordan.jpg
145 ms
9C65C756E4BF4600BAAB78B8E7BFAB60.js
938 ms
Dubais-Desert-UAE.jpg
144 ms
Rice-Terrace-Fields-Vietnam.jpg
145 ms
Dead-Sea-Israel.jpg
117 ms
Johannesburg-South-Africa.jpg
111 ms
close.svg
105 ms
fly-from.svg
104 ms
fly-to.svg
111 ms
London.jpg
256 ms
Paris.jpg
106 ms
Barcelona.jpg
249 ms
Berlin.jpg
244 ms
Rome.jpg
111 ms
Athens.jpg
122 ms
ovago.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ovago.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ovago.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ovago.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ovago.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ovago.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ovago. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: