Tools & Wizards About Us
oxfordbiblicalstudies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 42

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

Oxford Biblical Studies Online - Oxford Biblical Studies Online

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

337 ms

Resources Loaded

814 ms

Page Rendered

279 ms

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to oxfordbiblicalstudies.com homepage info - get ready to check Oxford Biblical Studies best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

Visit oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.175

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

337 ms

undo.css

25 ms

fonts.css

47 ms

layout.css

34 ms

home.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com, 30% (18 requests) were made to Wac.e887.edgecastcdn.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Gab.cookie.oup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (337 ms) belongs to the original domain Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 649.6 kB (72%)

Content Size

906.0 kB

After Optimization

256.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com main page is 906.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 609.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 32.4 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 136.1 kB
  • After minification 121.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oxford Biblical Studies needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 499.8 kB

  • Original 609.1 kB
  • After minification 397.2 kB
  • After compression 109.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 499.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 100.1 kB

  • Original 117.3 kB
  • After minification 83.4 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (66%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxford Biblical Studies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

337 ms

undo.css

undo.css

25 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

47 ms

layout.css

layout.css

34 ms

home.css

home.css

37 ms

site.css

site.css

68 ms

safari.css

safari.css

48 ms

jquery-1.6.min.js

jquery-1.6.min.js

105 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

75 ms

UnderbarHostsJS

UnderbarHostsJS

59 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

209 ms

jcarousellite.js

jcarousellite.js

81 ms

pf_oiunderbarinit.js

pf_oiunderbarinit.js

129 ms

pf_oiunderbar.css

pf_oiunderbar.css

59 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

141 ms

oupcookiepolicy.fancybox.js

oupcookiepolicy.fancybox.js

29 ms

oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js

oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js

29 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css

26 ms

ntpagetag.js

ntpagetag.js

32 ms

ui.dialog.css

ui.dialog.css

28 ms

ui.resizable.css

ui.resizable.css

29 ms

ntpagetag.gif

ntpagetag.gif

3 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

98 ms

bg_main.jpg

bg_main.jpg

81 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

81 ms

btn_logout.gif

btn_logout.gif

84 ms

btn_bible_lookup.gif

btn_bible_lookup.gif

79 ms

ico-help.png

ico-help.png

78 ms

bg_save_default.jpg

bg_save_default.jpg

83 ms

btn_lookUp.gif

btn_lookUp.gif

83 ms

btn_close.gif

btn_close.gif

84 ms

bg_searchBar.gif

bg_searchBar.gif

83 ms

icon_magnify.gif

icon_magnify.gif

84 ms

ico-book.gif

ico-book.gif

86 ms

bg_midNav.gif

bg_midNav.gif

84 ms

bg_arrow.png

bg_arrow.png

87 ms

bg-rightcol-article.gif

bg-rightcol-article.gif

86 ms

bg_focusOn.gif

bg_focusOn.gif

87 ms

home_image1.jpg

home_image1.jpg

160 ms

bg_browseCat.gif

bg_browseCat.gif

87 ms

bgd_homecontent.gif

bgd_homecontent.gif

87 ms

fpo_coogan_thumb.jpg

fpo_coogan_thumb.jpg

92 ms

btn_view_texts.gif

btn_view_texts.gif

97 ms

bgd_homecontent_02.gif

bgd_homecontent_02.gif

92 ms

fpo_wi2.gif

fpo_wi2.gif

94 ms

fpo_wi1.gif

fpo_wi1.gif

92 ms

fpo_wi3.gif

fpo_wi3.gif

110 ms

fpo_wi4.gif

fpo_wi4.gif

109 ms

logo-small.gif

logo-small.gif

156 ms

ntpagetag.gif

ntpagetag.gif

33 ms

oi-logo.gif

oi-logo.gif

45 ms

dot-inactive.png

dot-inactive.png

28 ms

btn-related-content.gif

btn-related-content.gif

28 ms

bkgd-wrapper.png

bkgd-wrapper.png

30 ms

arrow_gray_exp.png

arrow_gray_exp.png

29 ms

arrow_gray_hid.png

arrow_gray_hid.png

31 ms

bkgd-hide-arrow.gif

bkgd-hide-arrow.gif

52 ms

reveal-button.png

reveal-button.png

53 ms

wait.gif

wait.gif

54 ms

btn-search.gif

btn-search.gif

58 ms

ui-bg_glass_75_ffffff_1x400.png

ui-bg_glass_75_ffffff_1x400.png

58 ms

Accessibility Review

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com SEO score

42

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxfordbiblicalstudies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oxfordbiblicalstudies.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oxford Biblical Studies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: