11.6 sec in total
1.5 sec
9.2 sec
883 ms
Visit oxidal.ir now to see the best up-to-date Oxidal content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oxidal.ir
طراحی و قیمت نصب و اجرای محصولات متنوع نرده شیشه ای، درب شیشه ای، پارتیشن اداری و ویترین شیشه ای در شرکت مهندسی سازه های شیشه ای اکسیدال.
Visit oxidal.irWe analyzed Oxidal.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
oxidal.ir performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
1513 ms
359 ms
364 ms
365 ms
369 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Oxidal.ir, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Oxidal.ir.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (59%)
2.1 MB
851.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Oxidal.ir main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 819.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oxidal needs image optimization as it can save up to 273.1 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 548.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 548.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 375.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxidal.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 375.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (52%)
81
39
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxidal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oxidal.ir
1513 ms
k2.css
359 ms
calendar.css
364 ms
front.css
365 ms
module_default.css
369 ms
style.css
367 ms
modal.css
370 ms
camera_rtl.css
721 ms
css
68 ms
bootstrap-blue.css
900 ms
template.css
717 ms
blue.css
725 ms
template_rtl.css
723 ms
bootstrap-rtl.css
731 ms
menu_rtl.css
1068 ms
stylesheet.css
1068 ms
video-js.min.css
1070 ms
mootools-core.js
1256 ms
core.js
1081 ms
jquery.min.js
1439 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
1426 ms
k2.js
1426 ms
script.js
1425 ms
mootools-more.js
1796 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1610 ms
jquery.js
1976 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
1797 ms
mouseover13.js
1801 ms
sitescripts.js
1809 ms
video.min.js
2149 ms
vimeo.js
2178 ms
youtube.js
2180 ms
yjsge.js
2224 ms
acymailing_module.js
2343 ms
sp_highlighter.js
2366 ms
modal.js
2498 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
2530 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
2526 ms
camera.min.js
2258 ms
1.png
2748 ms
btn.png
2372 ms
2.png
2852 ms
3.png
2737 ms
83c2446a0896df0a1f4af01c940ae1d9_S.jpg
2736 ms
yjsg_layout.css
2266 ms
menus.css
2445 ms
newsitems.css
2626 ms
typo.css
2799 ms
joomladefaults.css
2804 ms
layout.css
2620 ms
4695cb3b19cbf906e45dac0da0913068_S.jpg
2645 ms
deb9f9efc56ef2a940bdf0d58ccaad5c_S.jpg
2711 ms
2cebfdae7a8ea5d691033c085990a9d4_S.jpg
2886 ms
3749aaa8ee129d7e919bddcc7e09cd36_S.jpg
3010 ms
2.png
2842 ms
1.png
2680 ms
bg-logo.png
557 ms
logo.png
554 ms
bg-slider.png
935 ms
bg-menu.png
729 ms
1.png
747 ms
2.png
753 ms
3.png
952 ms
4.png
941 ms
5.png
1275 ms
8.png
1102 ms
9.png
1110 ms
body-pattern.jpg
1426 ms
Search.png
1437 ms
bg-news.png
1258 ms
rss.png
1436 ms
style5.png
1440 ms
news.png
1597 ms
Arrow-news.png
1609 ms
footer-bg.gif
1803 ms
PTN77F-webfont.woff
2184 ms
yekan.woff
2013 ms
noie.png
1849 ms
browsers.jpg
1964 ms
hide.jpg
1802 ms
camera_skins.png
2237 ms
camera-loader.gif
2161 ms
9.jpg
3339 ms
Far_Fanni.woff
2491 ms
Far_Fanni.ttf
390 ms
001.jpg
356 ms
oxidal.ir accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
oxidal.ir best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oxidal.ir SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxidal.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxidal.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oxidal.ir
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oxidal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: