Tools & Wizards About Us
oxideoff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

oxideoff.com

A Simple DIY Operation to Repair Car Paint Oxidation and Faded Paint

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

512 ms

Resources Loaded

908 ms

Page Rendered

277 ms

oxideoff.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to oxideoff.com homepage info - get ready to check Oxideoff best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about oxideoff.com

Repair Car Paint Oxidation, Restore Faded Car Paint and Peeling Clear Coat, in a Simple Do-It-Yourself Operation. No tools required, no polishing and no hard rubbing.

Visit oxideoff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oxideoff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 512 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oxideoff.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.331

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oxideoff.com

512 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

21 ms

main.css

42 ms

styles.css

267 ms

ihover.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Oxideoff.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (512 ms) belongs to the original domain Oxideoff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 555.9 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oxideoff.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 961.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 31.0 kB

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 43.4 kB

  • Original 961.3 kB
  • After minification 917.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oxideoff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 137.5 kB
  • After compression 116.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 460.3 kB

  • Original 537.6 kB
  • After minification 537.5 kB
  • After compression 77.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxideoff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 460.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxideoff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oxideoff.com

oxideoff.com

512 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

21 ms

main.css

main.css

42 ms

styles.css

styles.css

267 ms

ihover.css

ihover.css

69 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

all.css

all.css

47 ms

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

61 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

36 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

59 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

style.css

style.css

77 ms

style.css

style.css

78 ms

main.js

main.js

81 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

111 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

111 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

111 ms

st_insights.js

st_insights.js

9 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

112 ms

swfaddress.js

swfaddress.js

120 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

223 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

254 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

125 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

139 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

141 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

147 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

160 ms

script.js

script.js

160 ms

script.js

script.js

171 ms

client.js

client.js

179 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

178 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

192 ms

jquery.zoom.min.js

jquery.zoom.min.js

197 ms

vc_image_zoom.min.js

vc_image_zoom.min.js

198 ms

st_insights.js

st_insights.js

15 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

34 ms

loxide-text-free-shippingtransparent_500x200-500x200.png

loxide-text-free-shippingtransparent_500x200-500x200.png

80 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

78 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

78 ms

Subaru-before-trunk.jpg

Subaru-before-trunk.jpg

81 ms

Acura-2-Hood-Before.jpg

Acura-2-Hood-Before.jpg

82 ms

Sunfire-Before.jpg

Sunfire-Before.jpg

81 ms

Honda-Civic-before.jpg

Honda-Civic-before.jpg

79 ms

Subaru-after-cropped-a-bit_5.jpg

Subaru-after-cropped-a-bit_5.jpg

83 ms

Acura-2-Hood-After-2nd-Coat.jpg

Acura-2-Hood-After-2nd-Coat.jpg

82 ms

Sunfire-After.jpg

Sunfire-After.jpg

82 ms

Honda-Civic-after.jpg

Honda-Civic-after.jpg

111 ms

bottle-new-logo-187x300.png

bottle-new-logo-187x300.png

109 ms

Cotton-Cloth-T-Shirt-150x150.jpg

Cotton-Cloth-T-Shirt-150x150.jpg

109 ms

paypal_checkout_EN.png

paypal_checkout_EN.png

109 ms

free_shipping-on-all-US-orders_bottom-removed-150x150.png

free_shipping-on-all-US-orders_bottom-removed-150x150.png

110 ms

transparent-5pc.png

transparent-5pc.png

97 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaBYXags.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaBYXags.ttf

62 ms

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiUmfW_Aw.ttf

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiUmfW_Aw.ttf

62 ms

Accessibility Review

oxideoff.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

oxideoff.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

oxideoff.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxideoff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxideoff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oxideoff.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oxideoff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: