3.7 sec in total
340 ms
3.1 sec
210 ms
Welcome to rfs.oxfordjournals.org homepage info - get ready to check Rfs Oxfordjournals best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rfs.oxfordjournals.org
Visit rfs.oxfordjournals.orgWe analyzed Rfs.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rfs.oxfordjournals.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
96/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,510 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.552
13/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
340 ms
162 ms
172 ms
168 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rfs.oxfordjournals.org, 16% (11 requests) were made to Oxfordjournals.org and 4% (3 requests) were made to Oasc-eu1.247realmedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Oxfordjournals.org.
Page size can be reduced by 267.6 kB (67%)
401.6 kB
134.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfs.oxfordjournals.org main page is 401.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 215.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rfs Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 166.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfs.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (61%)
66
26
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfs Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfs.oxfordjournals.org
340 ms
main.css
162 ms
homepage.css
172 ms
journal.css
168 ms
revfin_h20.css
149 ms
hw-preview-mode.css
147 ms
jcarousel-skin.css
171 ms
main.js
242 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
389 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
249 ms
jquery.jcarousel.local.js
256 ms
oup_ad_size.js
253 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css
6 ms
feed2js.php
1137 ms
jobboard_widget.css
759 ms
jobboard_widget.js
789 ms
oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js
4 ms
caturls.js
857 ms
advert.html
177 ms
advert.html
173 ms
cover.gif
308 ms
cover.gif
203 ms
cover.gif
276 ms
cover.gif
214 ms
cover.gif
193 ms
cover.gif
262 ms
cover.gif
222 ms
oj_logo.gif
104 ms
contact_us.gif
90 ms
my_basket.gif
101 ms
my_account.gif
95 ms
revfin_header.jpg
162 ms
revfin_title.jpg
233 ms
nav_separator_dark_grey.gif
187 ms
about_this_journal.gif
195 ms
contact_this_journal.gif
250 ms
subscriptions.gif
247 ms
current_issue.gif
251 ms
archive.gif
273 ms
search.gif
279 ms
arrow_black.gif
318 ms
read_this_journal.gif
331 ms
4.cover.gif
334 ms
go.gif
334 ms
cover.gif
621 ms
sfs%20logo.jpg
713 ms
oxford_open_small.gif
1067 ms
journals-career-network.png
1127 ms
oup-logo.png
1379 ms
jel_signup_button.gif
1415 ms
print.css
90 ms
search_this_journal.gif
90 ms
reader_services.gif
95 ms
border_dotted_grey_horiz.gif
110 ms
the_journal.gif
101 ms
for_authors.gif
97 ms
alerting_services.gif
116 ms
corporate_services_143.gif
169 ms
footer_ouptext.gif
181 ms
border_dotted_white_horiz.gif
178 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
34 ms
1.js
252 ms
01-01-2000
180 ms
implied
91 ms
@Top
88 ms
raps_rcfs_skyscraper_2014.gif
9 ms
86 ms
social-sciences.html
989 ms
rfs.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rfs.oxfordjournals.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfs.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rfs.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfs.oxfordjournals.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfs Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: