16 sec in total
3.8 sec
11.9 sec
307 ms
Visit rgj.trf.or.th now to see the best up-to-date Rgj Trf Or content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rgj.trf.or.th
Visit rgj.trf.or.thWe analyzed Rgj.trf.or.th page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rgj.trf.or.th performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value18.4 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
3773 ms
3194 ms
844 ms
1098 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Rgj.trf.or.th, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rgj.trf.or.th.
Page size can be reduced by 807.7 kB (34%)
2.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rgj.trf.or.th main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rgj Trf Or images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 402.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 402.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 396.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgj.trf.or.th needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 396.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (83%)
23
4
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgj Trf Or. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rgj.trf.or.th
3773 ms
3194 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
844 ms
layerslider.css
1098 ms
css
31 ms
front.css
1152 ms
ubermenu.min.css
1214 ms
blackwhite2.css
867 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1442 ms
custom.css
857 ms
main.css
2713 ms
styles.css
1137 ms
greensock.js
1730 ms
jquery.js
1743 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1417 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1791 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1704 ms
front-sorting.js
1729 ms
js
86 ms
ubermenu.min.js
1993 ms
modernizr.js
2018 ms
main.js
2309 ms
jquery.marquee.js
2029 ms
rgj-splash.png
2004 ms
bg-splash.png
2127 ms
SourceSansPro-Regular.woff
284 ms
th_chakra_petch_bold-webfont.woff
575 ms
rgj.trf.or.th accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rgj.trf.or.th best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rgj.trf.or.th SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
TH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgj.trf.or.th can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Thai is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rgj.trf.or.th main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgj.trf.or.th
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rgj Trf Or. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: