Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

rspg.or.th

โครงการอนุรักษ์พันธุกรรมพืชอันเนื่องมาจากพระราชดำริฯ

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

829 ms

rspg.or.th screenshot

About Website

Visit rspg.or.th now to see the best up-to-date Rspg Or content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rspg.or.th

Visit rspg.or.th

Key Findings

We analyzed Rspg.or.th page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rspg.or.th performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rspg.or.th

1407 ms

J3pS4EkvBfM

130 ms

laithai009.jpg

1015 ms

top_banner.jpg

1053 ms

top_menu.jpg

1004 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Rspg.or.th, 3% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rspg.or.th.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 589.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Rspg.or.th main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 78.0 kB

  • Original 91.8 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 172.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rspg Or needs image optimization as it can save up to 172.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 137.0 kB

  • Original 222.4 kB
  • After minification 222.3 kB
  • After compression 85.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 201.8 kB

  • Original 242.9 kB
  • After minification 242.8 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rspg.or.th needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (14%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

78

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rspg Or. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rspg.or.th accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

rspg.or.th best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rspg.or.th SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-874

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rspg.or.th can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rspg.or.th main page’s claimed encoding is windows-874. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rspg Or. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: