4.1 sec in total
378 ms
3.3 sec
474 ms
Click here to check amazing S Oliver content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about s.oliver.de
Visit s.oliver.deWe analyzed S.oliver.de page load time and found that the first response time was 378 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
s.oliver.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
378 ms
33 ms
41 ms
414 ms
421 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original S.oliver.de, 13% (5 requests) were made to Soliver.a.bigcontent.io and 11% (4 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Soliver.de.
Page size can be reduced by 723.9 kB (60%)
1.2 MB
481.0 kB
In fact, the total size of S.oliver.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 900.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 721.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 721.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. S Oliver images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (59%)
37
15
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of S Oliver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.soliver.de
378 ms
loader.js
33 ms
js
41 ms
api_dynamic.js
414 ms
api_static.js
421 ms
bundle_legacy.js
12 ms
gtm.js
807 ms
9034c1e.js
116 ms
307.7992f11f9cd96c7af931.js
10 ms
328.55d483e2c868bb1befc6.js
151 ms
331.ee36149666aeba3dc4be.js
151 ms
354.641bde7e45039b0a8d9d.js
11 ms
357.5be5bc106211a07412e8.js
100 ms
347.f632d4b3508e468e17cb.js
163 ms
341.d289820e7877c1438c4d.js
14 ms
293.77f78738d3c758629db2.js
17 ms
Home.742a5b206d34181da2b2.js
128 ms
0.bc590307725922e5e92b.js
266 ms
297.e1154477e0a0f74eabcf.js
1310 ms
291.72b09f23e11d78f4d8e1.js
130 ms
app.ff7f56ac31631a9b5613.js
308 ms
app.fe337fa9bdc45530ff4d.js
2169 ms
app.804a4b73735e58feecca.js
512 ms
languages.json
200 ms
weichenseitexl_neu
134 ms
74 ms
logo.c514aa2.svg
355 ms
69 ms
71 ms
youtube
75 ms
tiktok2
74 ms
de.json
160 ms
cross-domain-bridge.html
9 ms
1px.png
17 ms
gtm.js
1434 ms
translations-de.json
11 ms
uct
942 ms
logo_soliver
504 ms
s.oliver.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
s.oliver.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
s.oliver.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise S.oliver.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that S.oliver.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
s.oliver.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of S Oliver. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: