Tools & Wizards About Us
section-8-application.onlinepacket.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

Section 8 Application Form - How do I Apply for Section 8 Online?

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

487 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

389 ms

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org screenshot

About Website

Visit section-8-application.onlinepacket.org now to see the best up-to-date Section 8 Application Online Packet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

How do can I get a Section 8 application and apply online? 1. Find your local PHA. 2. See what Section 8 waiting lists are open. 3. Follow the instructions online to apply if a Section 8 application i...

Visit section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org page load time and found that the first response time was 487 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

487 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

54 ms

style.min.css

108 ms

unsemantic-grid.min.css

159 ms

style.min.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org, 23% (9 requests) were made to Fs27.formsite.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) belongs to the original domain Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

398.6 kB

After Optimization

357.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org main page is 398.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 280.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Section 8 Application Online Packet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 280.0 kB
  • After minification 280.0 kB
  • After compression 278.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (71%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Section 8 Application Online Packet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

487 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

54 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

108 ms

unsemantic-grid.min.css

unsemantic-grid.min.css

159 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

160 ms

mobile.min.css

mobile.min.css

157 ms

jquery.rating.css

jquery.rating.css

161 ms

style.css

style.css

161 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

165 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

208 ms

jquery.rating.min.js

jquery.rating.min.js

211 ms

embedManager.js

embedManager.js

21 ms

showFormEmbed

showFormEmbed

52 ms

bat.js

bat.js

53 ms

folderlogo.jpg

folderlogo.jpg

107 ms

spacer.jpg

spacer.jpg

81 ms

equal.jpg

equal.jpg

80 ms

house2.jpg

house2.jpg

82 ms

folderlogo.jpg

folderlogo.jpg

82 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

46 ms

fonts9.css

fonts9.css

9 ms

screen9.css

screen9.css

30 ms

responsive9.css

responsive9.css

30 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

47 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

42 ms

jquery.mask.min.js

jquery.mask.min.js

28 ms

form9.js

form9.js

34 ms

embed.js

embed.js

34 ms

api.js

api.js

77 ms

print9.css

print9.css

7 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

33 ms

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

88 ms

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

94 ms

fallback

fallback

40 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

4 ms

css

css

28 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

4 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

7 ms

Accessibility Review

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Section-8-application.onlinepacket.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

section-8-application.onlinepacket.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Section 8 Application Online Packet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: