Tools & Wizards About Us
1060interfase.podomatic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

1060interfase.podomatic.com

1060Interfase. El Podcast | Free Podcasts | Podomatic"

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

358 ms

1060interfase.podomatic.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 1060interfase.podomatic.com homepage info - get ready to check 1060Interfase Podomatic best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 1060interfase.podomatic.com

La grabación del programa 1060 Interfase, transmitido por Radio Educación desde la ciudad de México todos los jueves a las 1800 horas por el 1060 AM. Su tema principal es la tecnología particularmente...

Visit 1060interfase.podomatic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 1060interfase.podomatic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1060interfase.podomatic.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1060interfase.podomatic.com

258 ms

podcast_page_kustomized.css

78 ms

initializer.js

146 ms

palette.js

146 ms

jquery-tools-min-127.js

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original 1060interfase.podomatic.com, 55% (54 requests) were made to Assets.podomatic.net and 9% (9 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) relates to the external source Assets.podomatic.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (58%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

847.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 1060interfase.podomatic.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

  • Original 76.4 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 58.2 kB

  • Original 454.0 kB
  • After minification 395.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 1060Interfase Podomatic needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 808.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 391.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 808.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 240.5 kB

  • Original 282.8 kB
  • After minification 281.5 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1060interfase.podomatic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 240.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (65%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1060Interfase Podomatic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

1060interfase.podomatic.com

1060interfase.podomatic.com

258 ms

podcast_page_kustomized.css

podcast_page_kustomized.css

78 ms

initializer.js

initializer.js

146 ms

palette.js

palette.js

146 ms

jquery-tools-min-127.js

jquery-tools-min-127.js

62 ms

jquery-validate-pack.js

jquery-validate-pack.js

67 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

43 ms

search.js

search.js

72 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

85 ms

podomatic.js

podomatic.js

84 ms

podcast.js

podcast.js

82 ms

Exception.js

Exception.js

90 ms

main.js

main.js

71 ms

effects.js

effects.js

78 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

78 ms

controls.js

controls.js

85 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

81 ms

prototip.js

prototip.js

86 ms

additions_to_podcast_page.css

additions_to_podcast_page.css

99 ms

challenge

challenge

81 ms

bootstrap.namespaced.min.css

bootstrap.namespaced.min.css

82 ms

shared_splash.css

shared_splash.css

81 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

85 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

86 ms

shared_podsplash.js

shared_podsplash.js

85 ms

podo_toolbar_player.css

podo_toolbar_player.css

87 ms

player_toolbar.css

player_toolbar.css

91 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

87 ms

shim.js

shim.js

87 ms

util.js

util.js

88 ms

api.js

api.js

89 ms

share.js

share.js

87 ms

views.js

views.js

92 ms

podo_audio_player.js

podo_audio_player.js

93 ms

podo_toolbar_player.js

podo_toolbar_player.js

91 ms

player.js

player.js

91 ms

clipboard.js

clipboard.js

94 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

54 ms

thumb_logo_white_padded.png

thumb_logo_white_padded.png

46 ms

recaptcha.js

recaptcha.js

4 ms

icon_share.gif

icon_share.gif

48 ms

subscribe_with_itunes.gif

subscribe_with_itunes.gif

199 ms

add.gif

add.gif

49 ms

addtomyyahoo4.gif

addtomyyahoo4.gif

90 ms

mag-glass.png

mag-glass.png

42 ms

icon-login-fb.png

icon-login-fb.png

45 ms

icon-signup-fb.png

icon-signup-fb.png

48 ms

icon-signup-email.png

icon-signup-email.png

44 ms

icon-add-to-playlist.png

icon-add-to-playlist.png

42 ms

icon-share.png

icon-share.png

43 ms

icon-download.png

icon-download.png

42 ms

icon-drawer-up.png

icon-drawer-up.png

43 ms

embed_player_icon_square.png

embed_player_icon_square.png

44 ms

embed_player_icon.png

embed_player_icon.png

44 ms

share-btn.png

share-btn.png

47 ms

podo_loading.gif

podo_loading.gif

48 ms

rss2.gif

rss2.gif

103 ms

feV7hEPoVk1lWr-bhXVYTKn-pKdD7OYb3CJT_f4I1x0.js

feV7hEPoVk1lWr-bhXVYTKn-pKdD7OYb3CJT_f4I1x0.js

37 ms

lft-gradient.png

lft-gradient.png

88 ms

refresh.gif

refresh.gif

33 ms

pubads_impl_147.js

pubads_impl_147.js

46 ms

rt-gradient.png

rt-gradient.png

110 ms

audio.gif

audio.gif

11 ms

text.gif

text.gif

11 ms

help.gif

help.gif

12 ms

play_glossy.png

play_glossy.png

222 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

85 ms

460%3E_5104563.jpg

460%3E_5104563.jpg

243 ms

all.js

all.js

52 ms

460%3E_5071050.png

460%3E_5071050.png

370 ms

460%3E_5038805.png

460%3E_5038805.png

371 ms

460%3E_5007607.png

460%3E_5007607.png

378 ms

460%3E_4976237.png

460%3E_4976237.png

369 ms

460%3E_4976232.png

460%3E_4976232.png

369 ms

460%3E_4924402.png

460%3E_4924402.png

520 ms

460%3E_4882493.jpg

460%3E_4882493.jpg

963 ms

460%3E_4882476.jpg

460%3E_4882476.jpg

533 ms

460%3E_4818844.png

460%3E_4818844.png

681 ms

earbuds_background.jpg

earbuds_background.jpg

215 ms

earbuds_head.jpg

earbuds_head.jpg

216 ms

ads

ads

147 ms

container.html

container.html

146 ms

150 ms

reload

reload

42 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

25 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

160 ms

3841775902785577188

3841775902785577188

154 ms

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

156 ms

osd_listener.js

osd_listener.js

158 ms

osd.js

osd.js

170 ms

collect

collect

186 ms

image

image

50 ms

nr-974.min.js

nr-974.min.js

15 ms

lightbox_overlay.png

lightbox_overlay.png

72 ms

like.php

like.php

165 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

8 ms

ca48346479

ca48346479

42 ms

lH1ibRl5GKq.png

lH1ibRl5GKq.png

9 ms

Accessibility Review

1060interfase.podomatic.com accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

1060interfase.podomatic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

1060interfase.podomatic.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1060interfase.podomatic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 1060interfase.podomatic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

1060interfase.podomatic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1060Interfase Podomatic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: