50.9 sec in total
102 ms
42.7 sec
8.1 sec
Welcome to adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com homepage info - get ready to check Adobe Editoralternative PdfFiller best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com
Learn more about Adobe Acrobat alternatives, their features, pros, and cons. Explore how to take document management to the next level. Try pdfFiller!
Visit adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.comWe analyzed Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 50.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 46 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value5,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.621
10/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
102 ms
501 ms
20291 ms
20291 ms
20291 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com, 52% (44 requests) were made to Static-ak.pdffiller.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Static-ak.pdffiller.com.
Page size can be reduced by 237.4 kB (67%)
354.9 kB
117.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com main page is 354.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 290.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 236.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adobe Editoralternative PdfFiller images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 954 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)
33
13
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adobe Editoralternative PdfFiller. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com
102 ms
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com
501 ms
chat.css
20291 ms
style.css
20291 ms
build.css
20291 ms
build.css
20290 ms
build.css
20290 ms
competitors-page.css
20289 ms
babel-polyfill.min.js
20307 ms
api.js
161 ms
sks_track.js
187 ms
product.js
20264 ms
consts.js
20264 ms
lodash.min.js
20265 ms
react16-vendors.min.js
20264 ms
vendor.js
20264 ms
main.js
20256 ms
Uploader.v1.9.0.js
20257 ms
uploader.js
20257 ms
ModalApplication.js
20256 ms
competitorsPage.js
20242 ms
logo-pdffiller.svg
19997 ms
icon-feature-1.svg
19997 ms
icon-feature-2.svg
19997 ms
icon-feature-3.svg
19997 ms
icon-feature-4.svg
19996 ms
icon-feature-5.svg
19997 ms
icon-feature-6.svg
19997 ms
screen-6.png
19996 ms
screen-2.jpg
19996 ms
screen-3.png
19996 ms
screen-4.png
19996 ms
screen-5.png
19996 ms
screen-7.png
19996 ms
screen-8.png
19996 ms
screen-9.jpg
19987 ms
screen-10.jpg
19988 ms
screen-11.jpg
19988 ms
screen-12.jpg
19988 ms
screen-13.jpg
19989 ms
screen-14.png
19988 ms
screen-15.png
19988 ms
best-support-mid-market-spring-2022.svg
19988 ms
best-relationship-spring-2022.svg
19989 ms
easiest-setup-mid-market-spring-2022.svg
19988 ms
easiest-to-do-business-with-mid-market-spring-2022.svg
19988 ms
funnel.php
19988 ms
high-performer-mid-market-spring-2022.svg
19988 ms
users-likely-to-recommend-mid-market-spring-2022.svg
19987 ms
high-performer-enterprise-spring-2022.svg
19987 ms
recaptcha__en.js
258 ms
gtm.js
377 ms
uwt.js
372 ms
anchor
234 ms
styles__ltr.css
215 ms
recaptcha__en.js
247 ms
adsct
1143 ms
adsct
1139 ms
analytics.js
1787 ms
widget_async.js
1886 ms
webworker.js
694 ms
logo_48.png
443 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
988 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
989 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1031 ms
recaptcha__en.js
330 ms
widget_async.js
216 ms
publisher:getClientId
242 ms
triggerRunner.js
20 ms
widget.js
21 ms
collect
93 ms
collect
9 ms
collect
42 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
params
104 ms
bat.js
101 ms
params
274 ms
5437432.js
197 ms
21700752f52740d8a341ac702dba9caf.js
129 ms
input.js
349 ms
iframe
642 ms
5437432
370 ms
clarity.js
69 ms
pl.2.2.min.js
171 ms
c.gif
94 ms
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adobe-editor-alternative.pdffiller.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adobe Editoralternative PdfFiller. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: