6.7 sec in total
209 ms
6.1 sec
392 ms
Visit go.profisee.com now to see the best up-to-date Go Profisee content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about go.profisee.com
Solving your data quality issues requires a smarter approach to master data management (MDM). See how Profisee does MDM.
Visit go.profisee.comWe analyzed Go.profisee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
go.profisee.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value48.1 s
0/100
10%
Value75,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value98.1 s
0/100
10%
209 ms
291 ms
26 ms
43 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Go.profisee.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Profisee.com.
Page size can be reduced by 270.9 kB (26%)
1.1 MB
780.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Go.profisee.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 367.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 248.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 248.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Go Profisee images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Go.profisee.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 95 (83%)
115
20
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Profisee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.profisee.com
209 ms
profisee.com
291 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
43 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
42 ms
video-lightbox.js
58 ms
frontend.js
56 ms
E-v1.js
92 ms
custom.js
64 ms
search-filter-build.min.js
64 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
65 ms
v4-shims.min.js
65 ms
tiny-slider.js
62 ms
aos.js
75 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
82 ms
ecs.js
89 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
31 ms
core.min.js
38 ms
datepicker.min.js
31 ms
custom.js
250 ms
uael-nav-menu.min.js
250 ms
jquery_resize.min.js
252 ms
js_cookie.min.js
254 ms
waypoints.min.js
255 ms
uael-frontend.min.js
252 ms
platform.js
280 ms
mouse.min.js
278 ms
draggable.min.js
293 ms
swiper.min.js
278 ms
frontend.min.js
277 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
277 ms
recliner.min.js
278 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
306 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
307 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
307 ms
share-link.min.js
306 ms
dialog.min.js
307 ms
frontend.min.js
305 ms
ep-iframe.min.js
336 ms
helper.min.js
336 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
333 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
332 ms
fe21c1925f.js
306 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
336 ms
hooks.min.js
329 ms
i18n.min.js
344 ms
frontend.min.js
336 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
336 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
340 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
337 ms
tooltipster.min.js
345 ms
lazyload.min.js
333 ms
hotjar-2743297.js
448 ms
gtm.js
269 ms
fbevents.js
206 ms
arrow-menu-dropdown.svg
206 ms
search-icon.svg
194 ms
navy-brick.png
192 ms
green-brick.png
208 ms
blue-brick.png
210 ms
prettyPhoto.css
127 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
124 ms
bdt-uikit.css
202 ms
ep-helper.css
197 ms
style.min.css
210 ms
style.css
206 ms
custom.css
196 ms
search-filter.min.css
206 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
theme.min.css
202 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
186 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
186 ms
frontend.min.css
183 ms
post-3717.css
255 ms
frontend.min.css
221 ms
frontend.min.css
195 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
255 ms
all.min.css
246 ms
identity.js
27 ms
189874409973557
295 ms
v4-shims.min.css
216 ms
global.css
276 ms
post-3743.css
272 ms
post-3722.css
265 ms
post-3832.css
260 ms
post-13014.css
273 ms
post-13013.css
274 ms
post-11610.css
275 ms
post-11307.css
296 ms
post-11251.css
277 ms
post-9416.css
274 ms
style.css
277 ms
tiny-slider.css
274 ms
aos.css
287 ms
ecs-style.css
272 ms
post-6353.css
272 ms
post-8778.css
278 ms
post-8813.css
279 ms
post-8955.css
277 ms
post-9580.css
3747 ms
post-9686.css
3763 ms
post-9688.css
3802 ms
google-fonts-1.css
3774 ms
picturefill.min.js
3813 ms
clip-path-shape.jpg
772 ms
icon-youtube.svg
769 ms
orange-line.svg
756 ms
video-panel-bg-dots.svg
207 ms
reviews-slider-bg-dots.svg
760 ms
arrow-green.svg
768 ms
reviews-slider-halftone.svg
784 ms
icon-quotes.svg
781 ms
cta-bar-bg-dots.svg
772 ms
icon-demo.svg
778 ms
icon-facebook.png
928 ms
icon-twitter.png
782 ms
icon-linkedin.svg
802 ms
go.profisee.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
go.profisee.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
go.profisee.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Go.profisee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Go.profisee.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
go.profisee.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Go Profisee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: