Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

15.7 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

15.5 sec

Page Rendered

180 ms

packagespot.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Packagespot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about packagespot.com

Visit packagespot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Packagespot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 15.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packagespot.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

aplus_v1.html

82 ms

aplus_v1.jpg

305 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Packagespot.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) relates to the external source Verifymywhois.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

205.9 kB

After Optimization

172.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Packagespot.com main page is 205.9 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 205.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 168 B
  • After minification 166 B
  • After compression 143 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25 B or 15% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 205.7 kB
  • After minification 172.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Packagespot needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packagespot. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

SEO Factors

packagespot.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagespot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Packagespot.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packagespot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: