4.3 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.7 sec
246 ms
Visit packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com now to see the best up-to-date Packaging Pharmaceutical Business Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com
Packaging - Latest Industry News, Company Profiles and Market Analysis Reports from Pharmaceutical Business Review
Visit packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.comWe analyzed Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
1355 ms
236 ms
35 ms
483 ms
214 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com, 42% (18 requests) were made to Static.cbronline.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com.
Page size can be reduced by 410.7 kB (54%)
767.6 kB
356.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com main page is 767.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 399.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Pharmaceutical Business Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 274.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)
42
14
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Pharmaceutical Business Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com
1355 ms
pbr-main.2.0.6.1.css
236 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
jquery.tools.min_PBR.js
483 ms
jquery.ezpz_tooltip.min.js
214 ms
jquery.slicker.js
211 ms
jquery.validate.js
330 ms
jquery.tool.dropdown.js
213 ms
xVal.jquery.validate.js
328 ms
pmg.CustomValidators.js
308 ms
pmg.PartialViews.js
296 ms
pharmaceutical-BR.sdc.js
284 ms
ga.js
6 ms
gpt.js
6 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
23 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
__utm.gif
47 ms
container.html
36 ms
pageback.gif
305 ms
register-main2.gif
381 ms
ads
102 ms
nav_pbr.gif
95 ms
pbr-network-home.gif
176 ms
browsebysubject.gif
175 ms
nav-network-packaging.png
265 ms
button-search-packaging.jpg
369 ms
11140406056183208666
39 ms
button-select-packaging.gif
234 ms
left-network.gif
238 ms
icon-news.gif
235 ms
key.gif
300 ms
right-network-packaging.gif
341 ms
icon-supplier.gif
339 ms
icon-pressrelease.gif
339 ms
icon-reports.gif
341 ms
icon-product.gif
384 ms
osd.js
12 ms
seemore-packaging.gif
396 ms
footer.jpg
526 ms
toppage.gif
376 ms
17282898642637310005
10 ms
wtid.js
258 ms
dcs.gif
154 ms
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packaging.pharmaceutical-business-review.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Pharmaceutical Business Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: