7.6 sec in total
679 ms
6.7 sec
186 ms
Welcome to packaging52.com homepage info - get ready to check Packaging 52 best content right away, or after learning these important things about packaging52.com
Packaging Solution, a leading custom box manufacturer offering a diverse range of packaging solutions. From custom corrugated boxes to catalogues, dry-fruits boxes, fancy boxes, and chocolate boxes - ...
Visit packaging52.comWe analyzed Packaging52.com page load time and found that the first response time was 679 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
packaging52.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value23.7 s
1/100
10%
679 ms
977 ms
442 ms
651 ms
652 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Packaging52.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Packaging52.com.
Page size can be reduced by 312.1 kB (10%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Packaging52.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging 52 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packaging52.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)
65
24
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging 52. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packaging52.com
679 ms
packaging52.com
977 ms
style.css
442 ms
fonts.css
651 ms
font-awesome.css
652 ms
shortcodes.css
657 ms
responsive.css
660 ms
settings.css
659 ms
captions.css
663 ms
prettyPhoto.css
894 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
896 ms
colorpicker.css
898 ms
jquery.reject.css
900 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
23 ms
jquery-migrate.js
904 ms
jquery.validate.js
909 ms
js
69 ms
jquery.reject.js
1116 ms
jquery.easing.js
1117 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1131 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
1119 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
1123 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
1133 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
1342 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
1340 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.min.js
1343 ms
superfish.js
1348 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.js
1571 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1363 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1563 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1566 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
1566 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1572 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1598 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1787 ms
_utils.js
1791 ms
_front.js
1792 ms
contact-form.js
1796 ms
comment-reply.js
1801 ms
js
58 ms
googlemap-init.js
1826 ms
css
28 ms
fontello.css
1568 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1418 ms
_isotope.js
1416 ms
PS-Logo.png
482 ms
2-PS-Logo.png
438 ms
slide_0741351001457591375.jpg
2789 ms
slide_0993993001457591316.jpg
2695 ms
slide_0235572001457591222.jpg
2067 ms
0955523001457181115.jpg
457 ms
0576713001457181757.jpg
1184 ms
0103387001634646701.jpg
728 ms
0782184001457181677.jpg
981 ms
0398643001457181424.jpg
1188 ms
captcha.php
1451 ms
facebook.png
1465 ms
twitter.png
1466 ms
google-plus.png
1671 ms
bubble-down.png
1647 ms
mZSs29ggGoaqrCNB3kDfZQ.woff
192 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
27 ms
I5PmmDkYShUQg-ah7wh25w.woff
430 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
102 ms
trnbTfqisuuhRVI3i45C5w.woff
358 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
103 ms
fontellob701.woff
1650 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.woff
2059 ms
bullets.png
1839 ms
timer.png
1781 ms
loader.gif
1989 ms
menu-select.gif
2001 ms
bullet.png
225 ms
large_left.png
234 ms
large_right.png
233 ms
packaging52.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
packaging52.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
packaging52.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packaging52.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packaging52.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packaging52.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Packaging 52. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: