Tools & Wizards About Us
packagingalternatives.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

packagingalternatives.com

Packaging Alternatives Corporation | Ocala, FL | Packaging | Janitorial | Boxes

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

packagingalternatives.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to packagingalternatives.com homepage info - get ready to check Packaging Alternatives best content right away, or after learning these important things about packagingalternatives.com

Since 1994, Packaging Alternatives Corporation has serviced the packaging needs of businesses of all sizes in North and Central Florida. From our humble beginnings to our modern 42,000 square foot fac...

Visit packagingalternatives.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Packagingalternatives.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packagingalternatives.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.981

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

packagingalternatives.com

79 ms

catalog

15 ms

76 ms

default.aspx

430 ms

bootstrap.min.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Packagingalternatives.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Images.jmcatalog.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Packagingalternatives.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 355.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

911.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Packagingalternatives.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 551.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 93.9 kB

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 85.8 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 918 B

  • Original 551.9 kB
  • After minification 551.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Alternatives images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 102.1 kB

  • Original 300.5 kB
  • After minification 300.5 kB
  • After compression 198.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 158.6 kB

  • Original 299.8 kB
  • After minification 293.8 kB
  • After compression 141.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packagingalternatives.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.6 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (67%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Alternatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

packagingalternatives.com

packagingalternatives.com

79 ms

catalog

catalog

15 ms

76 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

430 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

118 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

96 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

117 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

112 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

111 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

111 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

153 ms

navbar.min.css

navbar.min.css

158 ms

items.min.css

items.min.css

160 ms

overall_Custom.css

overall_Custom.css

161 ms

navbar_top_Custom.css

navbar_top_Custom.css

160 ms

navbar_category_Custom.css

navbar_category_Custom.css

157 ms

st_Default.css

st_Default.css

194 ms

CombinedBaseSkinClassic.css

CombinedBaseSkinClassic.css

163 ms

FormDecorator.Default.css

FormDecorator.Default.css

189 ms

Ajax.Default.css

Ajax.Default.css

161 ms

WebForms.js

WebForms.js

109 ms

MicrosoftAjax.js

MicrosoftAjax.js

114 ms

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

160 ms

Core.js

Core.js

160 ms

ShortCutManagerScripts.js

ShortCutManagerScripts.js

159 ms

MaterialRippleScripts.js

MaterialRippleScripts.js

157 ms

RadFormDecorator.js

RadFormDecorator.js

161 ms

Ajax.js

Ajax.js

161 ms

jQueryExternal.js

jQueryExternal.js

187 ms

OverlayScript.js

OverlayScript.js

188 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

112 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

144 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

112 ms

item_sections.min.css

item_sections.min.css

143 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

100 ms

css2

css2

113 ms

css

css

62 ms

header-logo.png

header-logo.png

24 ms

PACKPOLYSTRAPH.JPG

PACKPOLYSTRAPH.JPG

205 ms

DELSCL502R.JPG

DELSCL502R.JPG

240 ms

INTHS.JPG

INTHS.JPG

219 ms

INTEH.JPG

INTEH.JPG

218 ms

ELKAY113.JPG

ELKAY113.JPG

240 ms

MIDINDMIP-100.JPG

MIDINDMIP-100.JPG

219 ms

PACK30.JPG

PACK30.JPG

216 ms

STOROBUBBLEPLUS.JPG

STOROBUBBLEPLUS.JPG

239 ms

STORO2.JPG

STORO2.JPG

242 ms

header-logo-small.png

header-logo-small.png

23 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

202 ms

4377421.gif

4377421.gif

22 ms

WwkQxPq1DFK04uqieVruMogI.ttf

WwkQxPq1DFK04uqieVruMogI.ttf

243 ms

bodybg.jpg

bodybg.jpg

28 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

26 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

24 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

266 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ731BKfyJ.ttf

18 ms

Accessibility Review

packagingalternatives.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

packagingalternatives.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

packagingalternatives.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagingalternatives.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packagingalternatives.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

packagingalternatives.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Alternatives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: