Tools & Wizards About Us
packagingpeople.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

packagingpeople.co.uk

Packaging People

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

522 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

891 ms

packagingpeople.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit packagingpeople.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Packaging People content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about packagingpeople.co.uk

Visit packagingpeople.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Packagingpeople.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packagingpeople.co.uk performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

packagingpeople.co.uk

522 ms

bootstrap.css

617 ms

font-awesome.min.css

312 ms

style.css

309 ms

style-responsive.css

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Packagingpeople.co.uk, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (640 ms) belongs to the original domain Packagingpeople.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 722.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

5.4 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Packagingpeople.co.uk main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 51.2 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.7 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 56.2 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging People images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 400.4 kB

  • Original 580.1 kB
  • After minification 492.0 kB
  • After compression 179.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 400.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 222.5 kB

  • Original 257.9 kB
  • After minification 215.0 kB
  • After compression 35.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packagingpeople.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 222.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (29%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging People. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

packagingpeople.co.uk

packagingpeople.co.uk

522 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

617 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

312 ms

style.css

style.css

309 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

209 ms

js

js

70 ms

js

js

61 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

358 ms

popper.js

popper.js

308 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

449 ms

site.js

site.js

178 ms

css2

css2

32 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

120 ms

logo.png

logo.png

112 ms

compostable-bags.jpg

compostable-bags.jpg

521 ms

slider-bg.jpg

slider-bg.jpg

318 ms

shrink-wrap-slider.jpg

shrink-wrap-slider.jpg

217 ms

packages.jpg

packages.jpg

640 ms

polythene-layflat-tubing.png

polythene-layflat-tubing.png

210 ms

flat-paper-bag.png

flat-paper-bag.png

242 ms

bubble-wrap.png

bubble-wrap.png

315 ms

cardboard-boxes-packaging.png

cardboard-boxes-packaging.png

436 ms

moving-house.png

moving-house.png

364 ms

polythene-bag.png

polythene-bag.png

422 ms

grip-seal-bags.png

grip-seal-bags.png

434 ms

pallet-wrap.png

pallet-wrap.png

484 ms

strapping.png

strapping.png

526 ms

carrier-bags-plain-printed.png

carrier-bags-plain-printed.png

539 ms

packaging-tape-fragile.png

packaging-tape-fragile.png

541 ms

padded-bags.png

padded-bags.png

606 ms

net-bags.png

net-bags.png

625 ms

client.jpg

client.jpg

632 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvUDQ.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvUDQ.ttf

20 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vUDQ.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vUDQ.ttf

32 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebukDQ.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebukDQ.ttf

66 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiukDQ.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiukDQ.ttf

44 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

606 ms

Accessibility Review

packagingpeople.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

packagingpeople.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

packagingpeople.co.uk SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagingpeople.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Packagingpeople.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

packagingpeople.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging People. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: