Tools & Wizards About Us
packetvideo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

packetvideo.com

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

381 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

180 ms

packetvideo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit packetvideo.com now to see the best up-to-date Packetvideo content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about packetvideo.com

Visit packetvideo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Packetvideo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packetvideo.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

packetvideo.com

381 ms

font-awesome.css

4 ms

normalize.css

172 ms

grid.css

321 ms

layout.css

511 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Packetvideo.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Packetvideo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 133.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

496.5 kB

After Optimization

362.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Packetvideo.com main page is 496.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 430.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 761 B, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 81.8 kB

  • Original 430.9 kB
  • After minification 349.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Packetvideo needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 194 B

  • Original 406 B
  • After minification 320 B
  • After compression 212 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 194 B or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 61.0 kB
  • After minification 45.6 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packetvideo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packetvideo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

packetvideo.com

packetvideo.com

381 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

4 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

172 ms

grid.css

grid.css

321 ms

layout.css

layout.css

511 ms

sp.css

sp.css

345 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

style.js

style.js

353 ms

logo.png

logo.png

172 ms

main01.jpg

main01.jpg

1548 ms

pv_banner.png

pv_banner.png

536 ms

ly_banner.png

ly_banner.png

161 ms

mark_tapling.jpg

mark_tapling.jpg

566 ms

SEO Factors

packetvideo.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packetvideo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Japanese. Our system also found out that Packetvideo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

packetvideo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packetvideo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: