1.5 sec in total
132 ms
975 ms
404 ms
Visit packetviper.com now to see the best up-to-date Packet Viper content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about packetviper.com
PacketViper a cybersecurity company that provides solutions for converging OT & IT networks. Protect your critical infrastructure with active cyber defense.
Visit packetviper.comWe analyzed Packetviper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
packetviper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
132 ms
304 ms
72 ms
47 ms
455 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Packetviper.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Script.crazyegg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.com.
Page size can be reduced by 127.4 kB (9%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Packetviper.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 850.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packet Viper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packetviper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (67%)
51
17
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packet Viper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packetviper.com
132 ms
www.packetviper.com
304 ms
js
72 ms
3046.js
47 ms
widget
455 ms
bootstrap.min.css
89 ms
fontawesome.min.css
114 ms
brands.min.css
127 ms
solid.min.css
127 ms
regular.min.css
129 ms
jquery.min.js
168 ms
jquery.ba.ajax.form.reCaptcha.v3.js
131 ms
jquery.ba.loadmore.min.js
145 ms
slick.min.css
157 ms
slick.min.js
161 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
160 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
199 ms
sumoselect.min.css
178 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
191 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
192 ms
affix.js
193 ms
aos.min.css
205 ms
aos.min.js
207 ms
fonts.css
221 ms
theme.css
224 ms
autosize.min.js
223 ms
jquery.inputmask.bundle.min.js
235 ms
main.js
231 ms
utils.js
237 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
296 ms
jquery-ui.css
258 ms
api.js
35 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
267 ms
jquery.block-hover.js
265 ms
ba-framework.css
45 ms
ba-forms.css
58 ms
ba-components.css
66 ms
ba-slick-slider.css
74 ms
recaptcha__en.js
77 ms
logo.png
68 ms
cybersecurity-company-packetviper.jpg
139 ms
shutterstock_1464584267-opt.jpg
116 ms
shutterstock_1963265632-opt.jpg
116 ms
shutterstock_768252712-opt.jpg
117 ms
i-ot.svg
67 ms
i-it.svg
117 ms
i-deception.svg
117 ms
shutterstock_1936528492-opt.jpg
119 ms
sprite-tri-right.svg
118 ms
gartner---amtd-homepage-640x420.jpg
119 ms
featured_bridges.jpg
120 ms
featured_network-security-.jpg
120 ms
featured_blog-part-5-image-.jpg
139 ms
shutterstock_1888986790.jpg
140 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
129 ms
packetviper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
packetviper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
packetviper.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packetviper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packetviper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packetviper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packet Viper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: