6.6 sec in total
613 ms
5.4 sec
519 ms
Visit padidar.com now to see the best up-to-date Padidar content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about padidar.com
شرکت فناوری پدیدار ارائه دهنده خدمات اینترنت، تجهیزات شبکه، آنتی ویروس بومی پادویش و خدات فنی و مهندسی | دارای مجوز کشوری SERVCO به شماره 18-95-100
Visit padidar.comWe analyzed Padidar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
padidar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
613 ms
1098 ms
386 ms
569 ms
581 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Padidar.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Goftino.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Padidar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 231.4 kB (27%)
859.7 kB
628.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Padidar.com main page is 859.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 708.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Padidar needs image optimization as it can save up to 104.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (73%)
70
19
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Padidar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
padidar.com
613 ms
padidar.com
1098 ms
theme.min.css
386 ms
style.css
569 ms
frontend.css
581 ms
style.min.css
570 ms
header-footer.min.css
576 ms
frontend-lite-rtl.min.css
611 ms
post-9.css
615 ms
all.min.css
760 ms
v4-shims.min.css
753 ms
public.css
764 ms
swiper.min.css
774 ms
frontend-lite-rtl.min.css
812 ms
global.css
815 ms
post-12.css
936 ms
post-429.css
950 ms
post-804.css
951 ms
post-137.css
967 ms
post-454.css
1015 ms
jquery.min.js
1229 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1123 ms
page-transitions.min.js
1140 ms
widget-icon-list-rtl.min.css
1138 ms
widget-nav-menu-rtl.min.css
980 ms
post-502.css
1032 ms
post-602.css
1138 ms
post-374.css
1141 ms
post-591.css
1146 ms
animations.min.css
1175 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1235 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1249 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1304 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1334 ms
hooks.min.js
1335 ms
vue.min.js
1571 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
1439 ms
instant-page.min.js
1453 ms
jet-plugins.js
1294 ms
frontend.js
1147 ms
lottie.min.js
1348 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1258 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1267 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1246 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1292 ms
i18n.min.js
1203 ms
frontend.min.js
1277 ms
waypoints.min.js
1288 ms
core.min.js
1269 ms
frontend.min.js
1286 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1296 ms
widgets-scripts.js
1216 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1290 ms
lazyload.min.js
1275 ms
223.svg
1001 ms
555.png
1592 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1172 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1025 ms
logo.png
404 ms
tajhizat.svg
185 ms
asdasdasdadad-1024x576.jpg
226 ms
an.svg
301 ms
TV-1-1024x576.jpg
549 ms
internet.svg
430 ms
Mobile-Phone-Tower-Radiation-1024x581.jpg
443 ms
cds.svg
495 ms
dta-1024x576.jpg
810 ms
ikgf.svg
634 ms
TV-4-1024x576.jpg
635 ms
padidar-logo-w.png
690 ms
195.png
731 ms
V_RIPE_NCC_Logo2015-440x1024-1.webp
798 ms
81.png
839 ms
q0Ms7B
806 ms
padidar.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
padidar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
padidar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Padidar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Padidar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
padidar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Padidar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: