2.7 sec in total
247 ms
2.4 sec
90 ms
Visit paf.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date PAF content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about paf.co.uk
[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="no" hundred_percent_height="no" hundred_percent_height_scroll="no" hundred_percent_height_center_content="yes" equal_height_columns="no" menu_anchor="" hide_...
Visit paf.co.ukWe analyzed Paf.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
paf.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value2,580 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.193
64/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
247 ms
241 ms
400 ms
308 ms
355 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Paf.co.uk, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Paf.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 98.0 kB (12%)
830.5 kB
732.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Paf.co.uk main page is 830.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 425.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, PAF needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paf.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (89%)
71
8
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PAF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
paf.co.uk
247 ms
www.paf.co.uk
241 ms
www.paf.co.uk
400 ms
3acc69d1acfc069d9a12c5566d17960d.min.css
308 ms
jquery.min.js
355 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
234 ms
js
56 ms
style.min.css
382 ms
hooks.min.js
236 ms
i18n.min.js
239 ms
index.js
380 ms
index.js
380 ms
miscellaneous-tracking.js
381 ms
api.js
38 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
426 ms
index.js
426 ms
awb-tabs-widget.js
427 ms
awb-vertical-menu-widget.js
428 ms
cssua.js
428 ms
modernizr.js
429 ms
fusion.js
490 ms
swiper.js
545 ms
bootstrap.transition.js
490 ms
bootstrap.tooltip.js
500 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
500 ms
jquery.easing.js
499 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
543 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
547 ms
jquery.ilightbox.js
645 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
571 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
571 ms
jquery.fade.js
615 ms
fusion-equal-heights.js
615 ms
fusion-parallax.js
622 ms
fusion-video-general.js
651 ms
fusion-video-bg.js
651 ms
fusion-lightbox.js
692 ms
fusion-tooltip.js
693 ms
fusion-sharing-box.js
698 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
721 ms
209012.js
63 ms
fusion-youtube.js
724 ms
vimeoPlayer.js
503 ms
avada-general-footer.js
540 ms
avada-quantity.js
538 ms
avada-crossfade-images.js
431 ms
avada-select.js
426 ms
avada-contact-form-7.js
429 ms
avada-live-search.js
433 ms
fusion-alert.js
473 ms
awb-off-canvas.js
429 ms
fusion-flexslider.js
433 ms
fusion-animations.js
454 ms
fusion-column-legacy.js
458 ms
awb-background-slider.js
462 ms
fusion-button.js
503 ms
fusion-container.js
503 ms
recaptcha__en.js
50 ms
avada-drop-down.js
447 ms
avada-to-top.js
459 ms
avada-header.js
463 ms
avada-menu.js
469 ms
bootstrap.scrollspy.js
511 ms
avada-scrollspy.js
463 ms
fusion-responsive-typography.js
469 ms
fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js
488 ms
fusion-general-global.js
471 ms
fusion-video.js
477 ms
fusion-column.js
473 ms
awb-icons.woff
546 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
700 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
540 ms
paf-logo100.png
543 ms
paf-icon57.png
487 ms
paf-logo114.png
546 ms
paf-iconwhite100.png
513 ms
paf-logo200.png
154 ms
paf.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
paf.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
paf.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paf.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paf.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paf.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PAF. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: