Tools & Wizards About Us
pagekeeper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

pagekeeper.com

PageKeeper - The Amazing "Automatic" Bookmark for books.

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

715 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

pagekeeper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pagekeeper.com homepage info - get ready to check Page Keeper best content right away, or after learning these important things about pagekeeper.com

Click here to learn about and buy PageKeeper the Automatic Bookmark. This metal bookmark device is every reader's best firend. See details here!

Visit pagekeeper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pagekeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 789 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pagekeeper.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pagekeeper.com

268 ms

PageKeeperStyles.css

149 ms

ga.js

9 ms

PageKeeper_Logo_Black_Text.png

87 ms

spacer.gif

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Pagekeeper.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) belongs to the original domain Pagekeeper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

68.1 kB

After Optimization

54.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pagekeeper.com main page is 68.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 33.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 352 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pagekeeper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 352 B or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Page Keeper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

pagekeeper.com

pagekeeper.com

268 ms

PageKeeperStyles.css

PageKeeperStyles.css

149 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

PageKeeper_Logo_Black_Text.png

PageKeeper_Logo_Black_Text.png

87 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

83 ms

PageKeeper_Package_Thumbnail.gif

PageKeeper_Package_Thumbnail.gif

138 ms

Button_Order_Now_Blue.png

Button_Order_Now_Blue.png

150 ms

HomePage_Figure1.gif

HomePage_Figure1.gif

280 ms

HomePage_Figure2.gif

HomePage_Figure2.gif

281 ms

HomePage_Figure3.gif

HomePage_Figure3.gif

285 ms

Credit_Card_Logos.gif

Credit_Card_Logos.gif

158 ms

Twitter_Icon.png

Twitter_Icon.png

212 ms

Facebook_Icon.png

Facebook_Icon.png

220 ms

YouTube_Icon.png

YouTube_Icon.png

232 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Button_Order_Now_Over.png

Button_Order_Now_Over.png

71 ms

Accessibility Review

pagekeeper.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

pagekeeper.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pagekeeper.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pagekeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pagekeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

pagekeeper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Page Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: