Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 0

    SEO

painneck.com

Neck Pain - Causes, symptoms, treatments and more

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

painneck.com screenshot

About Website

Visit painneck.com now to see the best up-to-date Pain Neck content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about painneck.com

Suffering from Neck Pain? Check symptoms, learn about causes and find the right treatment for your neck pain

Visit painneck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Painneck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

painneck.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value15,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.404

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

painneck.com

169 ms

www.painneck.com

214 ms

prototype.js

91 ms

scriptaculous.js

150 ms

lightbox.js

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Painneck.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 664.9 kB (68%)

Content Size

982.8 kB

After Optimization

317.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Painneck.com main page is 982.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 856.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pain Neck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 606.9 kB

  • Original 856.9 kB
  • After minification 802.6 kB
  • After compression 250.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 606.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Painneck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pain Neck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

painneck.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

painneck.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

painneck.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Painneck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Painneck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pain Neck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: