Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 65

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

paintingthepast.nl

Krijtverf: Traditionele krijtverf, watergedragen, omgevingsvriendelijk en slijtvast

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

399 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

3.3 sec

paintingthepast.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to paintingthepast.nl homepage info - get ready to check Paintingthepast best content right away, or after learning these important things about paintingthepast.nl

We zetten de traditie uit het verleden voort door authentieke verven te produceren met alleen de beste ingrediënten

Visit paintingthepast.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Paintingthepast.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

paintingthepast.nl performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,670 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

paintingthepast.nl

399 ms

paintingthepast.nl

503 ms

gtm.js

82 ms

css2

51 ms

all.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Paintingthepast.nl, 19% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Paintingthepast.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 741.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

21.9 MB

After Optimization

21.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Paintingthepast.nl main page is 21.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 22.4 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 713.3 kB

  • Original 21.8 MB
  • After minification 21.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paintingthepast images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 62.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 941 B

  • Original 23.6 kB
  • After minification 23.6 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paintingthepast.nl has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paintingthepast. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

paintingthepast.nl accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

paintingthepast.nl best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

paintingthepast.nl SEO score

65

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paintingthepast.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Paintingthepast.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paintingthepast. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: