Tools & Wizards About Us
pal.chat screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

pal.chat

jobpal — Recruitment Chatbots For Enterprise Companies

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

95 ms

pal.chat screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pal content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pal.chat

We build AI-powered chatbots that automate the engagement between companies and candidates. jobpal makes it easy for candidates to discover and apply for jobs so that recruiters can concentrate on bui...

Visit pal.chat

Key Findings

We analyzed Pal.chat page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pal.chat performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pal.chat

216 ms

pal.chat

395 ms

283 ms

gtm.js

45 ms

style.bundle.css

487 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Pal.chat, 48% (10 requests) were made to Jobpal-ai-static.s3.amazonaws.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source Jobpal-ai-static.s3.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.4 kB (60%)

Content Size

161.2 kB

After Optimization

63.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pal.chat main page is 161.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 101.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 35.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

  • Original 101.5 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pal.chat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pal.chat

pal.chat

216 ms

pal.chat

pal.chat

395 ms

283 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

45 ms

style.bundle.css

style.bundle.css

487 ms

all.css

all.css

55 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

form.js

form.js

331 ms

nav-bar-toggl.js

nav-bar-toggl.js

353 ms

scroll-events.js

scroll-events.js

360 ms

load-more.js

load-more.js

339 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

27 ms

logo.png

logo.png

99 ms

shape-1.png

shape-1.png

93 ms

track.js

track.js

35 ms

GT-Walsheim-Regular.woff

GT-Walsheim-Regular.woff

117 ms

GT-Walsheim-Medium.woff

GT-Walsheim-Medium.woff

200 ms

GT-Walsheim-Bold.woff

GT-Walsheim-Bold.woff

161 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

26 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

42 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

17 ms

Accessibility Review

pal.chat accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pal.chat best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pal.chat SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pal.chat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pal.chat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pal.chat

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: