Tools & Wizards About Us
palomabeach.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

palomabeach.com

Paloma Beach

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

palomabeach.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Paloma Beach content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about palomabeach.com

Visit palomabeach.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Palomabeach.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

palomabeach.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

palomabeach.com

184 ms

palomabeach.com

367 ms

www.palomabeach.com

667 ms

jquery-ui.css

20 ms

palomabeach.css

430 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Palomabeach.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Npmcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (912 ms) belongs to the original domain Palomabeach.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Palomabeach.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 99.5 kB

  • Original 109.7 kB
  • After minification 92.1 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.5 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 44.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paloma Beach images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 105.7 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Palomabeach.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (27%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paloma Beach. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

palomabeach.com

palomabeach.com

184 ms

palomabeach.com

palomabeach.com

367 ms

www.palomabeach.com

www.palomabeach.com

667 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

20 ms

palomabeach.css

palomabeach.css

430 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

44 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

175 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

4 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

6 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

33 ms

header.js

header.js

257 ms

validation.js

validation.js

259 ms

alertconfirmation.js

alertconfirmation.js

266 ms

popup.js

popup.js

267 ms

cookiebanner.js

cookiebanner.js

274 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

20 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

css2

css2

52 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

87 ms

logo.png

logo.png

103 ms

lang_en.png

lang_en.png

97 ms

header-account.png

header-account.png

97 ms

home-top.jpg

home-top.jpg

623 ms

logo-star.png

logo-star.png

98 ms

booking-date.png

booking-date.png

98 ms

booking-adult.png

booking-adult.png

170 ms

icon-wifi.png

icon-wifi.png

171 ms

icon-heatedpool.png

icon-heatedpool.png

172 ms

icon-jacuzzi.png

icon-jacuzzi.png

177 ms

icon-luggage.png

icon-luggage.png

182 ms

icon-shower.png

icon-shower.png

257 ms

icon-parking.png

icon-parking.png

256 ms

icon-excursions.png

icon-excursions.png

256 ms

icon-laundry.png

icon-laundry.png

265 ms

home-bottom.jpg

home-bottom.jpg

912 ms

icon-bookingdotcom.png

icon-bookingdotcom.png

342 ms

icon-tripadvisor.png

icon-tripadvisor.png

341 ms

icon-google.png

icon-google.png

343 ms

icon-map.png

icon-map.png

353 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

426 ms

icon-email.png

icon-email.png

427 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

430 ms

icon-instagram.png

icon-instagram.png

442 ms

icon-x.png

icon-x.png

513 ms

icon-youtube.png

icon-youtube.png

511 ms

icon-tiktok.png

icon-tiktok.png

517 ms

certificate-bookingdotcom.png

certificate-bookingdotcom.png

706 ms

certificate-tripadvisor.png

certificate-tripadvisor.png

597 ms

dream_orphans-webfont.woff

dream_orphans-webfont.woff

555 ms

Accessibility Review

palomabeach.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

palomabeach.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

palomabeach.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Palomabeach.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Palomabeach.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

palomabeach.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paloma Beach. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: