8.7 sec in total
308 ms
7.1 sec
1.3 sec
Visit paperfoam.com now to see the best up-to-date Paper Foam content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about paperfoam.com
Biodegradable packaging PaperFoam®: the best solution for the environment and your product. Choose PaperFoam® as eco-friendly packaging replacement for plastic!
Visit paperfoam.comWe analyzed Paperfoam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
paperfoam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.116
86/100
15%
Value10.2 s
26/100
10%
308 ms
590 ms
354 ms
740 ms
1029 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Paperfoam.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Paperfoam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.7 kB (6%)
2.9 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Paperfoam.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 152.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 152.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paper Foam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 92 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperfoam.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)
50
39
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paper Foam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
paperfoam.com
308 ms
www.paperfoam.com
590 ms
68a7391231c431b965d707972ab58675.css
354 ms
gtm.js
740 ms
Seed-Picture-1.2-PaperFoam_Layout-Linkedin-Size-600x403.png
1029 ms
Paper-recyclability7-600x403.png
1660 ms
BoxArray_TopShot-1.jpg
1602 ms
PaperFoam-Sustainable-Packaging-design-1.jpg
980 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
339 ms
icomoon.woff
766 ms
analytics.js
674 ms
insight.min.js
660 ms
js
277 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
178 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
121 ms
ga-audiences
47 ms
17 ms
logoklein-e1624230985336.png
90 ms
paperfoam-process-e1624234327931.png
276 ms
paperfoam-keurmerken.jpg
186 ms
ott-jacob-1-600x403.jpg
184 ms
medentis-1-600x403.jpg
180 ms
la-vida-es-bella-1-600x403.jpg
191 ms
korber-1-600x403.jpg
167 ms
kneipp-1-600x403.jpg
256 ms
gmk-1-600x403.jpg
362 ms
ecoblister-1-600x403.jpg
367 ms
IMG_0008-112-600x403.jpg
280 ms
IMG_1-600x403.jpeg
370 ms
DSC1397-600x403.jpg
343 ms
medentis1-600x403.jpg
367 ms
Schale1-600x403.jpg
370 ms
IMG_0006-100-600x403.jpg
432 ms
Pukka_1-600x403.jpg
454 ms
IMG_0830-600x403.jpg
460 ms
PaperFoam-Seedbom-by-Kabloom-600x403.jpg
461 ms
PF_Cochlear_01-600x403.jpg
463 ms
Nobel-Biocare-PaperFoam-packaging-interior-600x403.jpg
464 ms
1-ExEM-IQ-Medical-non-plastic-packaging-that-is-made-with-sustainable-material-group-shot-1000x1000-600x403.jpg
520 ms
tulipa-pizza-interior-2-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-477x403.jpg
547 ms
kipster-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x400.png
645 ms
fairphone-interior-2-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-Fairphone-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-600x400.png
648 ms
medical-interior-2-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x403.jpg
564 ms
makewonder-dash-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x403.jpg
562 ms
Plum-lightswitch-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-600x400.png
693 ms
Sustainable-non-plastic-tray-600x397.jpg
641 ms
burts-bees-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x403.jpg
648 ms
waterdrop-interior-2-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x403.jpg
649 ms
cox-high-speed-internet-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-Full-Res-Full-Res-600x403.jpg
732 ms
Valve-Steam-controller-high-end-bio-based-packaging-no-plastic-Fairphone-PaperFoam-sustainable-packaging-600x400.png
1015 ms
naturally-clicquot-2-standing-nobg-560x403.jpg
739 ms
iso9001.png
739 ms
iso27001.png
740 ms
paperfoam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paperfoam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
paperfoam.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperfoam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paperfoam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paperfoam.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Paper Foam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: