26.2 sec in total
304 ms
16.2 sec
9.7 sec
Visit paperkit.net now to see the best up-to-date Paperkit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about paperkit.net
Make your own graph paper. Customize page and grid size as well as color of the lines. Download as a free printable PDF
Visit paperkit.netWe analyzed Paperkit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 25.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
paperkit.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value2.5 s
90/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.41
24/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
304 ms
187 ms
498 ms
130 ms
485 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Paperkit.net, 11% (6 requests) were made to Use.edgefonts.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source P.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 555.4 kB (61%)
904.1 kB
348.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Paperkit.net main page is 904.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 679.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Paperkit needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 458.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 458.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperkit.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)
51
19
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paperkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
paperkit.net
304 ms
normalize.min.css
187 ms
font-awesome.min.css
498 ms
lato.js
130 ms
jquery-ui.css
485 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
485 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
630 ms
jquery.svg.css
310 ms
main.css
468 ms
jquery.svg.js
468 ms
jquery.svgdom.js
630 ms
jscolor.js
631 ms
jspdf.js
664 ms
FileSaver.js
609 ms
BlobBuilder.js
608 ms
jspdf.plugin.addimage.js
609 ms
jspdf.plugin.standard_fonts_metrics.js
663 ms
adsbygoogle.js
133 ms
plugins.js
585 ms
main.js
584 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
208 ms
paperkit.net
317 ms
ca-pub-5808933084954632.js
358 ms
zrt_lookup.html
1517 ms
show_ads_impl.js
544 ms
all.js
1190 ms
graphpaper.jpg
990 ms
letter-01in-025in.jpg
988 ms
letter-025in-025in.jpg
989 ms
letter-05in-05in.jpg
989 ms
letter-1in-05in.jpg
988 ms
a4-5mm-5mm.jpg
988 ms
a4-10mm-5mm.jpg
1231 ms
pla
312 ms
widgets.js
250 ms
Dopb7dy69kTeo1u_6R20avo4zIzonPViIQHRwuvwcuJffHkqgsMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i26I.woff
1019 ms
Ql7HFTxZUFk-LlNQSjjVhJQCCp4LAxcbn30BRk25dyGffOeqgsMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i26Y.woff
1019 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1705 ms
ads
251 ms
osd.js
203 ms
1684 ms
analytics.js
1125 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
748 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
549 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
2225 ms
ue9uW6QDDcendc_pfl2efjO7HfQqJVx8VwqOlBv2KVCffHhqgsMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i265.woff
1690 ms
TbRnCvmv10kN4jqsC7ozB1xhu0ChdCYwwfqflZNieyIffOHqgsMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i26s.woff
781 ms
p.gif
2285 ms
like.php
1502 ms
collect
1594 ms
4qFiRLLPSF7.js
2039 ms
lH1ibRl5GKq.png
1182 ms
hs.png
905 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
609 ms
cross.gif
583 ms
arrow.gif
583 ms
jot
453 ms
paperkit.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
paperkit.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
paperkit.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperkit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Paperkit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paperkit.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paperkit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: