Tools & Wizards About Us
papermill.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

papermill.in

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

343 ms

papermill.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Papermill content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about papermill.in

Visit papermill.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Papermill.in page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

papermill.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value26,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

papermill.in

196 ms

papermill.in

1733 ms

twemoji.js

340 ms

wp-emoji.js

353 ms

gtranslate-style24.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Papermill.in, 90% (60 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Papermill.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.1 kB (34%)

Content Size

447.4 kB

After Optimization

293.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Papermill.in main page is 447.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 174.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 96.2 kB

  • Original 117.1 kB
  • After minification 115.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 46.4 kB

  • Original 174.5 kB
  • After minification 174.3 kB
  • After compression 128.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 155.9 kB
  • After minification 155.9 kB
  • After compression 144.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Papermill.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (97%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Papermill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

papermill.in

papermill.in

196 ms

papermill.in

papermill.in

1733 ms

twemoji.js

twemoji.js

340 ms

wp-emoji.js

wp-emoji.js

353 ms

gtranslate-style24.css

gtranslate-style24.css

353 ms

style.css

style.css

416 ms

css

css

169 ms

style.css

style.css

591 ms

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

322 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

534 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

604 ms

styles.css

styles.css

547 ms

contact-form-7-main.css

contact-form-7-main.css

549 ms

dashicons.css

dashicons.css

667 ms

front_style.css

front_style.css

760 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

777 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

771 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

1067 ms

sms_alert_customer_validation_style.css

sms_alert_customer_validation_style.css

826 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

889 ms

select2.css

select2.css

975 ms

wpzoom-socicon.css

wpzoom-socicon.css

993 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

996 ms

academicons.min.css

academicons.min.css

996 ms

font-awesome-3.min.css

font-awesome-3.min.css

1058 ms

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

1143 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1162 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1338 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

1228 ms

page.js

page.js

123 ms

script.js

script.js

1234 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

1285 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

1391 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

32 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1454 ms

core.js

core.js

1592 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1591 ms

regenerator-runtime.js

regenerator-runtime.js

1593 ms

wp-polyfill.js

wp-polyfill.js

1626 ms

dom-ready.js

dom-ready.js

1623 ms

hooks.js

hooks.js

1624 ms

i18n.js

i18n.js

1484 ms

a11y.js

a11y.js

1476 ms

autocomplete.js

autocomplete.js

1484 ms

select2.js

select2.js

1623 ms

xoo-ml-phone-js.js

xoo-ml-phone-js.js

1516 ms

style.js

style.js

1376 ms

index.js

index.js

1480 ms

index.js

index.js

1479 ms

jquery.blockUI.js

jquery.blockUI.js

1458 ms

add-to-cart.js

add-to-cart.js

1487 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

1465 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

1416 ms

cart-fragments.js

cart-fragments.js

1439 ms

otp-sms.min.js

otp-sms.min.js

1460 ms

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

1480 ms

utils.js

utils.js

1566 ms

phone-number-validate.js

phone-number-validate.js

1378 ms

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

1410 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1432 ms

brave.js

brave.js

1553 ms

eso.e18d3993.js

eso.e18d3993.js

211 ms

make-in-india-1536x819-1-300x160.jpg

make-in-india-1536x819-1-300x160.jpg

1162 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1094 ms

socicon.ttf

socicon.ttf

1086 ms

sm.23.html

sm.23.html

88 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

229 ms

Accessibility Review

papermill.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

papermill.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

papermill.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Papermill.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Papermill.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

papermill.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Papermill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: