3.2 sec in total
115 ms
2 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Paper Packaging content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about paperpackaging.net
Edge Protector, Paper Cones & Composite Cans & Container Manufacturer offered by Bharath Paper Conversions from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Visit paperpackaging.netWe analyzed Paperpackaging.net page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
paperpackaging.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value4.3 s
41/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.145
77/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
115 ms
97 ms
404 ms
37 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Paperpackaging.net, 35% (12 requests) were made to Tdw.imimg.com and 24% (8 requests) were made to 5.imimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source 5.imimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.6 kB (44%)
461.8 kB
257.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Paperpackaging.net main page is 461.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 246.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 203.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 203.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paper Packaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 821 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 42 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperpackaging.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (35%)
31
20
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paper Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
paperpackaging.net
115 ms
www.paperpackaging.net
97 ms
www.paperpackaging.net
404 ms
css
37 ms
style_17_min.css
29 ms
paper-cone-500x500.jpg
636 ms
yarn-spinning-cones-500x500.JPG
1065 ms
edge-protectors-coimbatore-500x500.jpg
1255 ms
recycled-paper-cones-500x500.jpg
1255 ms
u-profile-paper-edge-protector-500x500.jpg
1254 ms
industrial-paper-tubes-500x500.jpg
1246 ms
colored-paper-cones-500x500.jpg
645 ms
food-packaging-paper-cans-500x500.jpg
1255 ms
jquery.js
24 ms
common_20_dyn_isq17_min.js
8 ms
multi_img_dyn_isq_1.php
81 ms
im-imvc-rw-cf.js
5 ms
bharath-paper-conversions-logo-90x90.png
811 ms
iframe_api
76 ms
sprite3.png
12 ms
multi_img_enq_dyn_isq_16_min.js
16 ms
enqforms_dyn_isq2_min.css
40 ms
cntryintlTelInput_new4.js
3 ms
Sms_valiadation_dyn_isq_min.js
45 ms
footerform_1_min.js
45 ms
cntry_flags.png
65 ms
dyn_isq_form9_min.js
47 ms
suggest_new_product_dyn_1_min.js
46 ms
loader.gif
7 ms
www-widgetapi.js
17 ms
ga.js
20 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
paperpackaging.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paperpackaging.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
paperpackaging.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperpackaging.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paperpackaging.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paperpackaging.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Paper Packaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: