Tools & Wizards About Us
paperrater.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

paperrater.com

PaperRater: Free Online Proofreader with Grammar Check, Plagiarism Detection and more

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

675 ms

Page Rendered

202 ms

paperrater.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Paper Rater content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about paperrater.com

PaperRater proofreads and rates your essays & papers. It picks out grammar & spelling errors, detects plagiarism and grades your writing. It includes resources on grammar, writing, spelling & more.

Visit paperrater.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Paperrater.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 877 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

paperrater.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,960 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.paperrater.com

124 ms

gtm.js

69 ms

adsbygoogle.js

150 ms

analytics.js

33 ms

background.gif

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Paperrater.com, 39% (16 requests) were made to Assets.paperrater.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (302 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

521.9 kB

After Optimization

468.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Paperrater.com main page is 521.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 324.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 36.2 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 152.5 kB
  • After minification 129.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Paper Rater needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 324.1 kB
  • After minification 324.1 kB
  • After compression 320.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperrater.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paper Rater. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.paperrater.com

www.paperrater.com

124 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

69 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

150 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

background.gif

background.gif

145 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

138 ms

jquery-1.7.0.min.js

jquery-1.7.0.min.js

184 ms

rails.min.js

rails.min.js

195 ms

application.js

application.js

195 ms

framework.js

framework.js

194 ms

block_obf.js

block_obf.js

144 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

143 ms

paper-rater-logo.png

paper-rater-logo.png

192 ms

prater_icon_240x229D.png

prater_icon_240x229D.png

241 ms

banner-bullet.gif

banner-bullet.gif

256 ms

btn-usenowfree.gif

btn-usenowfree.gif

256 ms

grammar_checking_thumb.gif

grammar_checking_thumb.gif

255 ms

writing_suggestions_thumb.gif

writing_suggestions_thumb.gif

255 ms

plagiarism_thumb.gif

plagiarism_thumb.gif

255 ms

lifehack_178x58.jpg

lifehack_178x58.jpg

255 ms

user.svg

user.svg

138 ms

immediate.png

immediate.png

141 ms

feedback.png

feedback.png

53 ms

accessibility.png

accessibility.png

239 ms

facebook_small.png

facebook_small.png

139 ms

twitter_small.png

twitter_small.png

252 ms

youtube_small.png

youtube_small.png

252 ms

collect

collect

79 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

234 ms

imh19mitsk

imh19mitsk

263 ms

destination

destination

130 ms

gQz.js

gQz.js

260 ms

collect

collect

217 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

159 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

302 ms

151 ms

widget-bg.gif

widget-bg.gif

93 ms

thumb-shadow.gif

thumb-shadow.gif

93 ms

btn-usenowfree2.png

btn-usenowfree2.png

93 ms

31 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

paperrater.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

paperrater.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

paperrater.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperrater.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Paperrater.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

paperrater.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paper Rater. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: