Tools & Wizards About Us
papersheep.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

papersheep.com

Brand Management Software for Consistent Brand Communication

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

papersheep.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to papersheep.com homepage info - get ready to check Papersheep best content right away, or after learning these important things about papersheep.com

For more than 20 years we've been enabling brands with brand management software to more consistent & efficient marketing communication.

Visit papersheep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Papersheep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

papersheep.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

papersheep.com

426 ms

www.papersheep.com

421 ms

220 ms

fontello.css

103 ms

pretty-checkbox.min.css

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Papersheep.com, 73% (33 requests) were made to Brandguardian.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Brandguardian.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 661.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Papersheep.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 52.8 kB
  • After minification 46.7 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 611.9 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Papersheep needs image optimization as it can save up to 611.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 63.0 kB
  • After minification 63.0 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 51.1 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Papersheep.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (41%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Papersheep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

papersheep.com

papersheep.com

426 ms

www.papersheep.com

www.papersheep.com

421 ms

220 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

103 ms

pretty-checkbox.min.css

pretty-checkbox.min.css

206 ms

iwcc_frontend.css

iwcc_frontend.css

308 ms

js.cookie-2.2.1.min.js

js.cookie-2.2.1.min.js

390 ms

iwcc_frontend.js

iwcc_frontend.js

388 ms

site.min.css

site.min.css

485 ms

tul5utq.css

tul5utq.css

71 ms

custom.css

custom.css

389 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

407 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

518 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

501 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

502 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

502 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

509 ms

Logo-BRANDGUARDIAN.svg

Logo-BRANDGUARDIAN.svg

616 ms

architecture-2083687_1920.jpg

architecture-2083687_1920.jpg

1191 ms

marketing_workflow.jpg

marketing_workflow.jpg

1264 ms

2397237_w757_indoor_applicationpicture_klein_2.jpg

2397237_w757_indoor_applicationpicture_klein_2.jpg

1126 ms

2k_bg_image-1152-2.jpg

2k_bg_image-1152-2.jpg

1053 ms

2k_bg_image-1162.jpg

2k_bg_image-1162.jpg

915 ms

05_siemens_-_250.jpg

05_siemens_-_250.jpg

1123 ms

2k_cc_shutterstock_790787989.jpg

2k_cc_shutterstock_790787989.jpg

1120 ms

sto_dsc_6012.jpg

sto_dsc_6012.jpg

1184 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

1241 ms

mission_white.svg

mission_white.svg

1220 ms

challenge_white.png

challenge_white.png

1232 ms

Logo-G.svg

Logo-G.svg

1286 ms

linkedin-icon.svg

linkedin-icon.svg

1308 ms

xing-icon.svg

xing-icon.svg

1317 ms

youtube-icon.svg

youtube-icon.svg

1329 ms

vimeo-icon.svg

vimeo-icon.svg

1342 ms

p.css

p.css

26 ms

349440190

349440190

342 ms

d

d

88 ms

d

d

108 ms

d

d

107 ms

d

d

107 ms

marketing_use_cases_black.jpg

marketing_use_cases_black.jpg

788 ms

d

d

23 ms

d

d

24 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

713 ms

api.js

api.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

papersheep.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

papersheep.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

papersheep.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Papersheep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Papersheep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

papersheep.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Papersheep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: