1.8 sec in total
373 ms
1.1 sec
280 ms
Visit paradisess.com now to see the best up-to-date Paradise Ss content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about paradisess.com
Visit paradisess.comWe analyzed Paradisess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
paradisess.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
373 ms
92 ms
91 ms
124 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Paradisess.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) belongs to the original domain Paradisess.com.
Page size can be reduced by 156.7 kB (20%)
775.3 kB
618.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Paradisess.com main page is 775.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 579.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paradise Ss images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paradisess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)
20
12
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paradise Ss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
paradisess.com
373 ms
modernizr.js
92 ms
style.css
91 ms
editor-style.css
124 ms
editor-style.css
190 ms
wp-members-2012.css
156 ms
jquery.min.js
359 ms
triad_default.js
256 ms
ag_script.js
290 ms
wp-embed.min.js
321 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
266 ms
bg.jpg
101 ms
hover.jpg
101 ms
logo.jpg
146 ms
search.png
179 ms
header.png
375 ms
box.png
213 ms
bullet.png
246 ms
h2.jpg
279 ms
footer.png
312 ms
goudsanl-webfont.woff
322 ms
paradisess.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paradisess.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
paradisess.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paradisess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paradisess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paradisess.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paradise Ss. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: