Tools & Wizards About Us
paralife.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

paralife.com

Providing financial protection for emerging consumers and micro-entrepreneurs

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

561 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

181 ms

paralife.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Paralife content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about paralife.com

Visit paralife.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Paralife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 561 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

paralife.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.245

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.paralife.com

561 ms

style.min.css

176 ms

styles.css

179 ms

style.min.css

180 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Paralife.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com and 2% (1 request) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (844 ms) belongs to the original domain Paralife.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 257.1 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

995.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Paralife.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 666.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 90.0 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 92.1 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 666.4 kB
  • After minification 633.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paralife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 98.6 kB

  • Original 374.1 kB
  • After minification 374.1 kB
  • After compression 275.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 106.1 kB
  • After minification 106.1 kB
  • After compression 71.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paralife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (76%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paralife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.paralife.com

www.paralife.com

561 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

176 ms

styles.css

styles.css

179 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

180 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

180 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

185 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

186 ms

theme-fonts.css

theme-fonts.css

264 ms

style.css

style.css

445 ms

google-font.css

google-font.css

268 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

268 ms

runtime.css

runtime.css

276 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

280 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

354 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

372 ms

app.js

app.js

470 ms

omgf-stylesheet-48.css

omgf-stylesheet-48.css

376 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

294 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

386 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

387 ms

index.js

index.js

483 ms

index.js

index.js

484 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

486 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

486 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

487 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

487 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

491 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

491 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

549 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

549 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

738 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

561 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

582 ms

ext.js

ext.js

675 ms

jquery.transit.js

jquery.transit.js

639 ms

jquery.touchswipe.js

jquery.touchswipe.js

639 ms

jquery.quartz.js

jquery.quartz.js

651 ms

idangerous.swiper.js

idangerous.swiper.js

677 ms

jquery.imageaccordion.js

jquery.imageaccordion.js

641 ms

jquery.isotope.js

jquery.isotope.js

639 ms

jquery.waypoints.js

jquery.waypoints.js

665 ms

modals.js

modals.js

680 ms

jquery.smoothState.js

jquery.smoothState.js

725 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

646 ms

jquery.parallax.min.js

jquery.parallax.min.js

647 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

649 ms

custom.js

custom.js

671 ms

logo.png

logo.png

438 ms

slider8.jpg

slider8.jpg

700 ms

slider2-1.jpg

slider2-1.jpg

699 ms

slider3-1.jpg

slider3-1.jpg

611 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

610 ms

fam.jpg

fam.jpg

527 ms

store.jpg

store.jpg

619 ms

staff.jpg

staff.jpg

619 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

745 ms

logo_footer.png

logo_footer.png

656 ms

foundation_logo_x2.png

foundation_logo_x2.png

666 ms

ioa_front.woff

ioa_front.woff

844 ms

counter.js

counter.js

19 ms

t.php

t.php

124 ms

Accessibility Review

paralife.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

paralife.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

paralife.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paralife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paralife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

paralife.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paralife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: