4.3 sec in total
96 ms
3.6 sec
598 ms
Click here to check amazing Parspake content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about parspake.com
Visit parspake.comWe analyzed Parspake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
parspake.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.948
3/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
96 ms
129 ms
97 ms
191 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Parspake.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Parspake.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.5 kB (4%)
3.2 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Parspake.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Parspake images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Parspake.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (38%)
87
54
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Parspake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
main
96 ms
home-page
129 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
97 ms
front_end_style.css
191 ms
dashicons.min.css
285 ms
desktop_style.css
192 ms
style.css
192 ms
style.css
218 ms
jquery.min.js
313 ms
css
50 ms
css
69 ms
jquery.fullPage.css
285 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
476 ms
jquery.fullPage.js
379 ms
jquery.slimscroll.js
323 ms
js
75 ms
maplace.js
379 ms
foundation.css
386 ms
what-input.js
407 ms
foundation.js
602 ms
app.js
494 ms
style_res.css
473 ms
formreset.min.css
500 ms
formsmain.min.css
506 ms
readyclass.min.css
577 ms
browsers.min.css
578 ms
comment-reply.min.js
588 ms
wp-embed.min.js
587 ms
jquery.json.min.js
650 ms
gravityforms.min.js
670 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
664 ms
api.js
39 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
logo.png
239 ms
bg_menu_icon.png
238 ms
bg_slide_05.jpg
471 ms
slider_icon_01.png
316 ms
bg_slide_06.jpg
479 ms
bg_slide_04.jpg
580 ms
slider_icon_04.png
382 ms
bg_slide_01.jpg
660 ms
bg_slide_03.jpg
668 ms
slider_icon_03.png
477 ms
bg_slide_02.jpg
686 ms
slider_icon_02.png
586 ms
renoo.jpg
671 ms
zarin-1.jpg
782 ms
32.jpg
878 ms
31.jpg
789 ms
30.jpg
786 ms
29.jpg
792 ms
28-1.jpg
801 ms
pic_08.jpg
888 ms
solutions_01.png
896 ms
solutions_02.png
905 ms
solutions_03.png
921 ms
solutions_04.png
921 ms
solutions_05.png
1113 ms
solutions_06.png
1112 ms
solutions_07.png
1107 ms
solutions_08.png
1076 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
36 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
37 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
38 ms
collect
26 ms
solutions_09.png
1053 ms
i3.png
1058 ms
u3.png
1122 ms
clients_01-200x70.png
1119 ms
js
135 ms
02-200x70.png
1072 ms
03-200x70.png
1071 ms
1-200x70.png
1077 ms
recaptcha__en.js
138 ms
05-200x70.png
1025 ms
06-200x70.png
1081 ms
07-200x70.png
1094 ms
08-200x70.png
1024 ms
fallback
33 ms
09-200x70.png
957 ms
fallback__ltr.css
3 ms
css
17 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
4 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
6 ms
aval.png
914 ms
pds.png
920 ms
line_slider.png
943 ms
line_02.png
854 ms
line_03.png
864 ms
line_04.png
788 ms
icon_footer.png
826 ms
arrow.png
840 ms
line_05.png
865 ms
parspake.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
parspake.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
parspake.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Parspake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Parspake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
parspake.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Parspake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: