Tools & Wizards About Us
partneragentur-vergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

partneragentur-vergleich.de

Partnervermittlungen im Vergleich Partnervermittlungen im Vergleich - Partneragentur-Vergleich

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

772 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

partneragentur-vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Partneragentur Vergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about partneragentur-vergleich.de

Partnervermittlungen und Singlebörsen im Vergleich. Wir testen Partnerbörsen im Internet für Sie. Kostenloser Service seit 2006.

Visit partneragentur-vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Partneragentur-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 772 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

partneragentur-vergleich.de performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,810 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.partneragentur-vergleich.de

772 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

551 ms

default.css

227 ms

postratings-css.css

223 ms

features.css

224 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Partneragentur-vergleich.de, 7% (4 requests) were made to Siegel.ausgezeichnet.org and 5% (3 requests) were made to Partneragenturvergleich.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Partneragentur-vergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 408.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

844.9 kB

After Optimization

436.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Partneragentur-vergleich.de main page is 844.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 301.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 300.6 kB
  • After minification 295.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Partneragentur Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 201.1 kB

  • Original 301.0 kB
  • After minification 296.7 kB
  • After compression 99.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 153.8 kB

  • Original 180.6 kB
  • After minification 139.5 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Partneragentur-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (65%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Partneragentur Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.partneragentur-vergleich.de

www.partneragentur-vergleich.de

772 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

551 ms

default.css

default.css

227 ms

postratings-css.css

postratings-css.css

223 ms

features.css

features.css

224 ms

awp-columns.css

awp-columns.css

284 ms

footable.core.min.css

footable.core.min.css

442 ms

style.css

style.css

551 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

555 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1023 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

608 ms

footable.min.js

footable.min.js

770 ms

footable.sort.min.js

footable.sort.min.js

774 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

6 ms

third-party.min.js

third-party.min.js

772 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

786 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

1040 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

1215 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

1021 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

1127 ms

custom.css

custom.css

952 ms

css

css

26 ms

widget.js

widget.js

277 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1010 ms

uwpqsfscript.js

uwpqsfscript.js

1013 ms

postratings-js.js

postratings-js.js

1025 ms

bj-lazy-load.min.js

bj-lazy-load.min.js

1048 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1203 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

1220 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1228 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1347 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1358 ms

style.css

style.css

1622 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

45 ms

Partneragentur-Vergleich_header_bg.jpg

Partneragentur-Vergleich_header_bg.jpg

329 ms

partnervermittlungen_paar_liebe-1280x480.jpg

partnervermittlungen_paar_liebe-1280x480.jpg

674 ms

PAV_Logo_Partneragenturvergleich.png

PAV_Logo_Partneragenturvergleich.png

322 ms

singleboerse_paar_selfie-1280x480.jpg

singleboerse_paar_selfie-1280x480.jpg

907 ms

casual-dating_paar_restaurant-1280x480.jpg

casual-dating_paar_restaurant-1280x480.jpg

726 ms

shortcode-toggle-open.png

shortcode-toggle-open.png

280 ms

logo-embed-m.png

logo-embed-m.png

204 ms

rating-4_5-cent-m.png

rating-4_5-cent-m.png

202 ms

bg-embed-m.png

bg-embed-m.png

274 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

198 ms

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

199 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

685 ms

rating_over.gif

rating_over.gif

233 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

Partneragentur-Vergleich_header_bg.jpg

Partneragentur-Vergleich_header_bg.jpg

271 ms

PAV_Logo_Partneragenturvergleich.png

PAV_Logo_Partneragenturvergleich.png

488 ms

Features_Mini_Test.gif

Features_Mini_Test.gif

255 ms

Feature_Test.gif

Feature_Test.gif

221 ms

Feature_Partnerboersen-Finder.gif

Feature_Partnerboersen-Finder.gif

225 ms

Feature_Bewertung.gif

Feature_Bewertung.gif

228 ms

Features_Mini_Test.gif

Features_Mini_Test.gif

228 ms

Accessibility Review

partneragentur-vergleich.de accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

partneragentur-vergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

partneragentur-vergleich.de SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Partneragentur-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Partneragentur-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

partneragentur-vergleich.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Partneragentur Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: